Baker, A J (2019) 'Suitable and sufficient'? UK regulation of post-construction fire safety. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh, UK.
Abstract
There have been considerable reductions in UK fire deaths and casualties over the last fifty years, but on-going innovation in the built environment means that fire risks need constantly to be reappraised and addressed. This innovation takes the form not only of new materials and architectural approaches, but also of new methods of fire safety regulation. While existing research has addressed many aspects of this innovation, one crucial area has been neglected: that of post-construction fire safety regulation. This thesis examines this topic focusing on how fire safety is maintained during the life times of buildings. All new buildings have fire safety features that are a requirement of design approval, but these need to be maintained and used appropriately for the remainder of the building's operational life. The key development in UK post-construction regulation in recent years has been the shift towards self-regulation in which the onus is on duty holders (usually the employer) to assess and maintain an appropriate level of fire safety. This thesis documents the emergence, rationale, and operation of this system, and addresses key issues and concerns with the way it functions. In particular, the efficacy ... (continues)
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Spinardi, G and Bisby, L |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | built environment; fire safety; innovation; new build; regulation; safety; employer; emergence; UK |
| Index terms: | self-regulation, documents, new build, fire safety, approval, duty, built environment, regulation, emergence |
| Subjects: | professional development, behavioral psychology, contractual role, infrastructure and transport systems, systems engineering, political science, construction integration, health safety and environment |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Governance, Contract Administration, Urban Studies, Information Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here