Investigation of quality management practices in building construction sites in the UK

Marasini, R and Quinnell, P (2010) Investigation of quality management practices in building construction sites in the UK. In: Egbu, C (ed.) Proceedings of 26th Annual ARCOM Conference, 6-8 September 2010, Leeds, UK.

Abstract

Some large construction companies have adopted quality certification such as ISO9000 to manage their construction projects to ensure the effectiveness, flexibility and competitiveness of a business as a whole. A study presented in this paper investigates the status of quality management on building construction sites of a major ISO9000 certified construction company in the UK. A questionnaire survey of site managers working in eleven projects was conducted and views of thirty five site managers were analysed. The findings of the study suggest that site managers possess familiarity with some techniques used to ensure quality in their respective projects. However, they were reliant upon their own experience and concepts to manage quality. It was perceived that senior management did not demonstrate any leadership with respect to the quality system and lacked uniformity in methods and frequencies of communications. The majority of site managers suggested that they considered quality management equally important when compared to health and safety. However, the site managers perceived that senior management attention to the quality was less. The study shows a lack of training of the site managers in the skills required for quality management. There is a need to make site managers more aware of quality management systems, procedures and their importance in delivering projects within the stipulated quality.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: quality management; site practice; training
Index terms: site manager, quality management system, construction project, competitiveness, effectiveness, investigation, questionnaire, quality management, quality management practice, health and safety, certification, building construction, construction company, survey
Subjects: management, performance management, health safety and environment, production management, market analysis, building construction, administrative processes, quality assurance, data collection methods, organization, practitioner, project delivery
Topics: Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Project Management, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Contract Administration, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here