Coleman, N (2019) Project critical success factors: A study of linear transportation projects. PhD thesis, Northcentral University, USA.
Abstract
Transportation projects have played a critical role throughout United States history dating back as far as the transcontinental railroad and the interstate highway system authorized under the National Interstate and Defense Highways Act of 1956. Massive transportation initiatives such as these have proven to be key drivers of the economy, with resulting highways, rail lines, and air-freight infrastructure serving as the lifeblood to economic growth and opportunities associated with interstate commerce and globalization. Resource requirements and failure costs on transportation projects remains significant, resulting in the need for further exploration of specific factors impacting project performance. There have been prior attempts to identify generic project critical success factors; however, upon review of the literature, there is minimal information on a standard set of factors unique to transportation construction projects within the United States. The purpose of this study was to gain insight into the efficacy of existing success factor constructs within the framework of linear transportation construction projects, and to gain insight into factors that transportation construction managers view as critical in achieving project success. A qualitative research method and multiple case study research design was used for this project and was conducted in two phases; the first requiring completion of a survey, and the second being completion of follow-up interviews with randomly selected respondents. Research findings indicated that in the transportation construction industry, organizational culture, project management maturity, and external constraints such as utilities and environmental permitting, must be leveraged effectively to ensure success of the project. Recommendations for future research included replication to a larger pool of potential respondents to include perspectives from both engineers and contractors which would gather a wider range of insights into the identification of transportation related CSFs and their role in influencing project success.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Sopko, L |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | culture; economic growth; failure; organizational culture; construction project; highway; highways; utilities; commerce; globalization; project success; United States; critical success factor; project performance; case study; interview; qualitative research |
| Index terms: | case study, project success, research design, engineer, utilities, project performance, commerce, economic growth, construction industry, project management, interview, United States, qualitative research method, transportation project, success factor, survey, construction project, qualitative research, exploration, construction manager, globalization, history, critical success factor, organizational culture |
| Subjects: | construction type, environmental resource management, economic development, Geography, production management, asset management, research design and methodology, profession, data collection methods, control systems, health monitoring assessment and metrics, architectural and construction history, project management theory and practice, sociology, economic factors, industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, International Construction, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Project Management, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here