Reza Hosseini, M; Chileshe, N and Zillante, G (2014) Investigating the factors associated with job satisfaction of construction workers in South Australia. Construction Economics and Building, 14(3), pp. 1-17. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is twofold. Firstly, its aim is to ascertain the major aspects of job satisfaction for South Australian construction workers including the main ramifications of job satisfaction in the working environment. Secondly, it investigates the influence of key age-related factors i.e. chronological age, organisational age and length of service on major aspects of job satisfaction. The collected data for this study comprised 72 questionnaires completed by construction practitioners working at operational levels in the South Australian construction industry. Based on the responses from the target group, this study deduced that job dissatisfaction was predominantly related to the adverse impact on personal health and quality of life. In addition, indifference and the perception of dejection in the workplace are the main consequences of low levels of job satisfaction. Inferential analyses revealed that none of the age-related factors could significantly affect the major aspects of job satisfaction of construction workers in the South Australian context. The study concludes with providing practical suggestions for redesigning human resources practices for increasing the level of job satisfaction within the South Australian construction industry.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | age; construction industry; job satisfaction; South Australia; workers |
| Index terms: | human resource, low level, questionnaire, quality of life, construction worker, construction industry, construction practitioner, job satisfaction, South Australia |
| Subjects: | management, data collection methods, physical geography and landforms, public and environmental health, practitioner, professional development, measurement and scaling, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Information Management, Human Resources |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here