Ho, C T T (2019) Application of optimization to the production planning of construction prefabrication supply chains. PhD thesis, University of Washington, USA.
Abstract
Prefabrication and modularization are a growing trend in the construction industry. Efficiencies of the operation of construction prefabrication and modularization (CP&M) supply chains result in benefits for construction projects. Although the variable delivery time of construction schedules impacts the operation efficiencies of CP&M supply chains, few studies have investigated this problem by addressing uncertainties in CP&M schedules. On the other hand, the growing interest in CP&M motivates many prefabrication companies to open multiple fabrication shops and allocate jobs between these shops based on various factors. Nonetheless, few quantitative models are available to facilitate this allocation, and research on the CP&M supply chain with multiple shops is scarce. This study aims to fill this gap by investigating the application of optimization to facilitate the production planning of the CP&M supply chain with multiple fabrication shops. This study starts with a literature review covering 110 CP&M papers to understand common improvement strategies. Seven strategies were identified including using building information modelling, focusing on product design, using advanced technologies, applying lean principles, utilizing optimizations in production planning, utilizing optimizations in design and using simulation. Then, an industry survey with 10 fabricators is performed to understand current practices and impacts of uncertainty. After that, two optimization models for job allocations and production planning are developed: one is a deterministic model and the other is a stochastic programing model with multi objectives. Each optimization model is demonstrated through an example problem. The first model generates an optimal solution for the example problem that saves 2. 5% of total cost compared to the Early Due Date method. The second model allows to develop a robust set of optimal schedules subject to uncertainty and flexible in balancing cost and time reduction objectives. Its example shows that variable delivery time causes up to 2. 93% of total cost increase. Moreover, a sensitivity analysis is introduced to quantify impacts of parameters sensitive to supply chain performance and identify improvement opportunities. This research is expected to contribute the knowledge on production planning of CP&M supply chain under uncertainty and enhance CP&M supply chain performance, therefore benefit construction projects and the construction industry.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Kim, Y-W and Zabinsky, Z B |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | optimization; uncertainty; construction project; building information model; building information modelling; fabrication; prefabrication; production planning; information modelling; simulation |
| Index terms: | construction project, time reduction, cost increase, strategy, literature review, production planning, survey, product design, sensitivity analysis, construction industry, prefabrication, fabrication, modularization, delivery time, supply chain performance, information modelling, building information modelling, efficiency |
| Subjects: | performance management, economics, management, information systems, industry analysis, data collection methods, supply chain performance, project delivery, data analysis and analytics, manufacturing engineering, digital design, production management, building construction, time analysis, environmental hazards, innovation and technology management |
| Topics: | Project Management, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Quality Management, Supply Chain Management, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Construction Technology, Digital Applications, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here