Hsu, P-Y (2019) Optimal logistics for modular construction. PhD thesis, Imperial College London, UK.
Abstract
The construction sector is currently undergoing a shift from in-situ construction to modular building systems that take advantage of modern prefabrication techniques. Long established conventional on-site building construction practices are thus being replaced by processes imported from the manufacturing sector, where component fabrication takes place within a factory environment. In this context, similar to manufacturing industries, the productivity of building components fluctuates, owing to human error and machine malfunction. Since the site demand must always be met, outsourcing manufacturing is employed to supplement the uncertain self-production. As a result of these transformations, the current construction supply chains, which have focused on the delivery of raw materials to sites, are no longer apt and need to make way to new, strengthened, and time-critical logistics systems. Moreover, previous studies have indicated that construction site delays constitute the most significant cause of schedule deviations. Thus, the primary reasons for causing schedule deviation need to be identified. In reality, owing to the complex structure of construction projects and long execution time, non-conformance in schedules occurs by a chain of events. Therefore, this research intends to investigate the factors causing schedule deviation in construction projects and understand the cause-effect relationships between the events leading to delays by implementing fault tree analysis. The primary aim of this research is to develop mathematical models by mixed-integer linear programming, two-stage stochastic programming and robust optimisation for revealing optimal logistic configurations for modular construction projects under various prevalent site demand perturbations. The models' outputs encompass the most favourable manufacturing, storage, transportation and outsourcing schemes, along with considerations of the best consolidation centre location for yielding the lowest modular construction supply chain operational cost. The applications of case studies demonstrate that the proposed models are effective and can serve as the foundation for a decision support system that optimises modular construction logistics under operational uncertainty.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Aurisicchio, M and Angeloudis, P |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction site; construction supply chain; decision support; linear programming; logistics; manufacturing; materials; prefabrication |
| Index terms: | building component, modular building system, construction sector, fault-tree analysis, programming, configuration, modular construction, construction project, building construction, construction site, manufacturing industry, decision support, mathematical model, fabrication, prefabrication, construction supply chain, in-situ, transformation, productivity, deviation, linear programming, case study, outsourcing |
| Subjects: | risk management, construction logistics, data collection methods, mathematical modelling, business, financial and cost management, work location, management, industry analysis, systems engineering, decision analysis, programming, construction methods, production management, manufacturing engineering, architectural elements, algorithms, building construction |
| Topics: | Project Management, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Procurement, Supply Chain Management, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Construction Technology, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here