Jebelli, H (2019) Wearable biosensors to understand construction workers' mental and physical stress. PhD thesis, University of Michigan, USA.
Abstract
Occupational stress is defined as harmful physical and mental responses when job requirements are greater than a worker's capacity. Construction is one of the most stressful occupations because it involves physiologically and psychologically demanding tasks performed in a hazardous environment this stress can jeopardize construction safety, health, and productivity. Various instruments, such as surveys and interviews, have been used for measuring workers' perceived mental and physical stress. However valuable, such instruments are limited by their invasiveness, which prevents them from being used for continuous stress monitoring. The recent advancement of wearable biosensors has opened a new door toward the non-invasive collection of a field worker's physiological signals that can be used to assess their mental and physical status. Despite these advancements, challenges remain: acquiring physiological signals from wearable biosensors can be easily contaminated from diverse sources of signal noise. Further, the potential of these devices to assess field workers' mental and physical status has not been examined in the naturalistic work environment. To address these issues, this research aims to propose and validate a comprehensive and efficient stress-measurement framework that recognizes workers mental and physical stress in a naturalistic environment. The focus of this research is on two wearable biosensors. First, a wearable EEG headset, which is a direct measurement of brain waves with the minimal time lag, but it is highly vulnerable to various artifacts. Second, a very convenient wristband-type biosensor, which may be used as a means for assessing both mental and physical stress, but there is a time lag between when subjects are exposed to stressors and when their physiological signals change. To achieve this goal, five interrelated and interdisciplinary studies were performed to; 1) acquire high-quality EEG signals from the job site; 2) assess construction workers' emotion by measuring the valence and arousal level by analyzing the patterns of construction workers' brainwaves; 3) recognize mental stress in the field based on brain activities by applying supervised-learning algorithms;4) recognize real-time mental stress by applying Online Multi-Task Learning (OMTL) algorithms; and 5) assess workers' mental and physical stress using signals collected from a wristband biosensor. To examine the performance of the proposed framework, we collected physiological signals from 21 workers at five job sites. Results yielded a high of 80. 13% mental stress-recognition accuracy using an EEG headset and 90. 00% physical stress-recognition accuracy using a wristband sensor. These results are promising given that stress recognition with wired physiological devices within a controlled lab setting in the clinical domain has, at best, a similar level of accuracy. The proposed wearable biosensor-based, stress-recognition framework is expected to help us better understand workplace stressors and improve worker safety, health, and productivity through early detection and mitigation of stress at human-centered, smart and connected construction sites.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Lee, S |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | accuracy; measurement; occupations; construction safety; construction site; noise; learning; monitoring; occupational stress; productivity; safety; construction worker; interview |
| Index terms: | monitoring, work environment, occupation, stressors, construction site, mitigation, survey, occupational stres, learning algorithm, productivity, construction worker, artifact, construction safety, interview, accuracy |
| Subjects: | sociology, financial risk, management, practitioner, work location, data collection methods, occupational health and safety management, professional development, algorithms, environmental health, control systems, health conditions and diseases |
| Topics: | Site Management, Cost Management, Digital Applications, Health and Safety, Organizational Design, Information Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Sustainability, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here