Video-based human motion capture and force estimation for comprehensive on-site ergonomic risk assessment

Liu, M (2019) Video-based human motion capture and force estimation for comprehensive on-site ergonomic risk assessment. PhD thesis, University of Michigan, USA.

Abstract

Construction is one of the most hazardous industries with high non-fatal injuries because it involves physically demanding tasks performed in an unstructured and dynamic environment. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) are the major cause of non-fatal injuries. Various methods, such as self-report, observation, and direct measurement, are used for assessing the risk level of WMSDs by quantifying the ergonomic risk factors (e.g., posture, repetition, and force). However, they are either time consuming or error-prone (e.g., self-report and observation) or invasive (e.g., direct measurement). The recent advancement of computer vision allows for rapid, accurate, and non-invasive motion capture only using ordinary cameras. Key challenges remain for applying to assess jobs’ ergonomic risks: 1) long-lasting occlusion in a construction site creates an obstacle to enforcing kinematic and temporal consistency between frames to estimate posture’s frequency and repetition; 2) as a critical risk factor for ergonomic risk assessment, force is very challenging to non-invasively estimate, which hinders field applications; and 3) little effort has been made for comprehensive ergonomic risk assessment. These knowledge gaps were addressed by three research objectives: 1) develop and validate a video-based human motion capture framework to quantify ergonomic risk factors of posture and its repetition by extracting continuous 2D/3D human model with enforced kinematic and temporal consistency; 2) develop and validate a video-based hand push force estimation framework; and 3) apply the risk factors estimated by videos to comprehensive ergonomic risk assessment tools including postural and biomechanical analysis. Results yielded around 11.6 and 7.5 degrees of joint angle estimation error for 2D and 3D motion captures, respectively, despite prevalent occlusions. Also, resultant frequency and duration comparison with experienced ergonomists’ observation demonstrates a great potential to robustly quantify jobs’ ergonomic risk factors of posture and repetition. Lab-based testing shows an accurate peak force occurrence time and peak force magnitude estimation, suggesting a potential to quantify critical variables of push force exertion only from videos. By applying the collected risk factors comprehensively to several ergonomic risk assessment tools, it demonstrates a promising level of risk assessment accuracy compared with expert observation and sensor-based measurement. The proposed video-based motion capture and force estimation frameworks for comprehensive ergonomic risk assessment are expected to greatly reduce the time and effort of on-site data collection and increase the number of evaluated jobs with higher frequency thereby providing a better opportunity to understand and control WMSDs.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Lee, S
Uncontrolled Keywords: accuracy; duration; measurement; construction site; risk assessment
Index terms: risk assessment, accuracy, risk factor, estimation, construction site, duration, computer vision, injury, testing, estimate
Subjects: work location, project controls, health conditions and diseases, environmental hazards, professional development, financial and cost management, computer vision, professional practice, financial risk
Topics: Time Control, Sustainability, Site Management, Cost Management, Health and Safety, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here