Modes of humanities and social thought in entry level civil engineering

Toussaint, C D (2019) Modes of humanities and social thought in entry level civil engineering. PhD thesis, University of Minnesota, USA.

Abstract

Like the rest of society, civil engineering has called for a balance among the interlinkages of economics, society, and the environment. Civil engineering governing bodies look to the humanities and social sciences as ingredients in the formula for such a balance in civil engineering education. However, the governing bodies appear to have left the strategy for implementation to educators. Inevitably, if we are to implement humanities and social sciences into the civil engineering curriculum, we need to answer the questions: what humanities and social sciences? And to what extent? This dissertation aimed to contribute to these answers. The objective of this study was to identify the modes of humanities and social thought in entry-level civil engineering. The study used a conceptual framework, which combines Vygotsky’s concept of the zone of proximal development, the concept of scaffolding and Jean Lave and Etienne Wenger concepts of community of practice and peripheral participation. This combination provided a framework by which I could investigate the humanities and social sciences in entry-level civil engineering practice and by so doing can inform engineering educators about undergraduate civil engineering curriculum. A grounded theory methodology as used to discover a phenomenon from which assertions were made about humanities and social sciences in entry-level civil engineering. Seven concepts emerged from the data. Through the interaction, interconnections of these seven concepts emerged the phenomenon, ‘Sustainable Civil Infrastructure Projects’. Sustainable Civil Infrastructure Projects take steps to optimize sustainability through the conscious application of sustainable management, effective communication, rules and ethics. These discipline branches of social science and humanities are foundational to sustainable civil engineering practice. However, navigating the social characteristics of sustainable civil engineering practice require more nuance. It requires the knowledge and application of social sciences and humanities that are not typically associated with engineering but are blended into sustainable civil engineering practice. The social sciences and humanities are interwoven into sustainable practice but connected in specific ways. This dissertation offered fourteen assertions to summarize the findings concerning the modes of humanities and social thought that are salient to entry-level civil engineers.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Roehrig, G H
Uncontrolled Keywords: education; ethics; sustainability; grounded theory; civil engineering; communication; participation; social science; infrastructure project; civil engineer
Index terms: civil engineer, scaffolding, strategy, society, conceptual framework, methodology, engineering education, sustainable management, grounded theory, ethics, sustainable practice, implementation, interaction, infrastructure project, dissertation, undergraduate, social science
Subjects: professional education, behavioral psychology, communities and social development, research methods, theoretical framing, health safety and environment, operations management, curriculum development, contractual arrangements, ethical practice, research dissemination and communication, sustainable practices, infrastructure and transport systems, management, profession
Topics: Sustainability, Procurement, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Education, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here