Vasserman, S (2019) Essays on industrial organization. PhD thesis, Harvard University, USA.
Abstract
This dissertation consists of three independent chapters. Chapter 1 examines the role of auction design in managing risk exposure for bidders in public procurement and minimizing costs for the government. I study the mechanism used to procure bridge construction by the Massachusetts Department of Transportation (DOT). I estimate a structural model of equilibrium bidding by risk-averse firms facing uncertainty about the final specification for each project at the time of bidding. I show that the existing mechanism insures risk-averse contractors against large changes in project scope, thereby reducing risk-premiums in bidding and ultimately lowering costs incurred by the DOT. Furthermore, while reducing uncertainty could reduce costs, I find that incentivizing additional competition is a more promising direction for policy intervention. Chapter 2 examines the extent to which a reference pricing policy could reduce prices for pharmaceutical drugs in the United States. I estimate a structural model of supply and demand for pharmaceuticals in the U.S. and in Canada. I then simulate counterfactuals in which American and Canadian regulators negotiate over prices with pharmaceutical representatives, but the United States constrains the prices that it is willing to accept by the prices set in Canada. I find that reference pricing results in a slight decrease in U.S. prices and a substantial increase in Canadian prices. Consequently, I find modest consumer welfare gains in the U.S. , substantial consumer welfare losses in Canada, and a net increase in pharmaceutical firms' profits. Chapter 3 examines the impact of a monitoring program in which a large US auto-insurer offered drivers a discount for good driving performance, as measured by a telematics device for their first contracted period. I demonstrate reduced form evidence of both adverse selection and moral hazard: drivers who choose to enter the monitoring program have lower average liability claims, but average claims rates are 23\% lower during the monitoring period than after. I estimate a structural model of driver claims and insurance plan choice and simulate several counterfactual regimes with respect to the availability of monitoring. While consumers face a disutility from being monitored, monitoring induces a net social surplus: both firm profits and net consumer welfare improve.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Lee, R; Pakes, A and Tamer, E |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | competition; liability; moral hazard; uncertainty; insurance; bidding; bridge construction; government; monitoring; policy; pricing; Canada; United States |
| Index terms: | adverse selection, bidder, insurance, project scope, monitoring, estimate, dissertation, pricing, supply and demand, regulator, Canada, evidence, competition, program, bidding, bridge construction, exposure, liability, telematics, industrial organization, specification, United States, profit, moral hazard, face |
| Subjects: | market analysis, networking, liability law, financial risk, infrastructure engineering, Geography, psychology, economic analysis, bidding, evaluation and assessment methods, research dissemination and communication, scope management, sociology, industry analysis, software systems, public and environmental health, contractual condition, financial and cost management, control systems |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Procurement, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Geographical Context, Site Management, Organizational Design, Contract Administration, Digital Applications, Stakeholder Management, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here