Alharbi, F (2020) Critical delay factors in housing construction projects in Saudi Arabia: Assessment and solutions. PhD thesis, Nottingham Trent University, UK.
Abstract
Given the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia's (KSA) current housing shortage, the government recently made substantial investments in public-sector housing projects across the country. To maximise the efficiency of these investments, the problem of construction projects delay must be overcome. Therefore, this research project identified delay factors in public-sector housing construction projects in the KSA, and proposed solutions for mitigating or avoiding the construction delays. The main aim of the study is to assess housing projects in the KSA, in terms of delays in the construction phase, and to develop a comprehensive framework based on the analysis of the delay factors (such as client-related, consultantrelated, etc.) to mitigate or prevent their occurrence. The study highlights the importance of delays in construction and provides a complete review of issues of importance in terms of concepts, principles and challenges. In addition, the literature was reviewed through an effective survey to find out the causes of delays in order to build general knowledge of delayed construction projects. A mixed-method research design was adopted involving a literature review, surveys, interviews and case studies. The primary data focused on the delay factors contributing to housing projects delay in the KSA's construction industry, as well as viable solutions. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics and thematic analysis, and the participants were clients, consultants and contractors in the KSA's construction industry. Consequently, more than 80 delay factors were identified, then classified into 10 groups and ranked in terms of their severity. A conceptual framework has been developed to advise on the processes that stakeholders should embrace in housing construction projects. Whereas, the solutions identified were used to generate an evidence-based framework, which practitioners can use to mitigate or avoid delays in housing projects. Key aspects of the solution may include the use of building information modelling (BIM), review and assess the government's role in housing projects. Furthermore, all stakeholders should take measures to prevent and reduce delay in housing projects, by promoting FIDIC contracts, establishing an independent planning board, integrating training and awareness initiatives, and eventually implementing the proposed conceptual framework.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Klalib, H A and Medjdoub, B |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building information modelling; construction phase; construction project; FIDIC; government; housing projects; investment; training; client; consultant; contractor; stakeholders; efficiency; case studies; interview; information modelling; thematic analysis; Saudi Arabia |
| Index terms: | case study, Saudi Arabia, building information modelling, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, efficiency, information modelling, research design, FIDIC, causes of delay, residential construction, construction phase, statistics, construction industry, data analysis, interview, housing project, survey, literature review, evidence, thematic analysis, practitioner, construction project, construction delay, housing, conceptual framework |
| Subjects: | housing and residential development, theoretical framing, digital design, Geography, production management, standard forms of contract, construction type, evaluation and assessment methods, practitioner, project controls, information systems, industry analysis, performance management, construction integration, methods and analysis, project delivery, data analysis and analytics, research design and methodology, mathematical modelling, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Procurement, Geographical Context, Project Management, Time Control, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here