Sandbhor, S and Botre, R (2014) Applying total interpretive structural modeling to study factors affecting construction labour productivity. Construction Economics and Building, 14(1), pp. 20-31. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
Construction sector has always been dependent on manpower with most of the activities being labour intensive. Project productivity, thus, depends directly on productivity of labour. Enhancing labour productivity would contribute to overall success of the project. In order to improve labour productivity, associated factors need due consideration. Total interpretive structural modeling (TISM) is implemented as a methodology for identifying and summarizing relationships among factors which affect productivity of labour. 10 most significant factors negatively affecting construction labour productivity are considered for developing model that establishes interpretive relationship among these factors. The result shows that material shortages, tool/equipment shortages, drawing & specification alterations during execution and working seven days per week without holiday have strong driving power and weak dependence power and are at the lowest level in hierarchy in the TISM model. Lack of labour surveillance and lack of labour experience have strong driving and strong dependence power. Top management of the project must stress on variables having high driving power so as to facilitate improvement in the overall productivity of construction site.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction project; interpretive structural modeling; labour productivity; total interpretive structural modeling |
| Index terms: | construction labour, drawing, interpretive structural modelling, construction site, top management, shortages, construction project, methodology, productivity, specification, labour productivity, construction sector, surveillance |
| Subjects: | economic analysis, technical documentation, work location, contractual condition, monitoring and control systems, research methods, data analysis and analytics, industry analysis, production management, management |
| Topics: | Contract Administration, Site Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Governance, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here