Fadoul, A (2020) A BIM-based model for constructability assessment of buildings design. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham, UK.
Abstract
Implementation of constructability principles in the construction industry has a potential return on investment concerning time and money. Existing empirical studies demonstrate that incorporating these principles into the initial stages of design maximises outcomes for all stakeholders, including designers, contractors, and clients. However, constructability encounters many challenges in practical implementation. One of the main obstacles is knowledge acquisition and representation, leading to the lack of a knowledge-based tool to model design constructability. Current methods demand laborious efforts and resources to execute assessment calculations and interpret their outcomes. The dynamic design process and the need for ongoing modifications in designed products necessitate revision of the constructability assessment routine, whenever design changes are introduced, and it is highly desirable that these revisions should be automated. This research, therefore, investigates design-stage assessment of design constructability by examining contemporary process and object-oriented models. The study reviews currently employed approaches for assessing design constructability and highlights their shortcomings. Based on this, it presents an original assessment framework to measure constructability of BIM-based design solutions. The proposed mechanism separates the formulation of construction knowledge from carrying out the assessment processes. The modelling framework is composed of three key parts: the Constructability Model (CM), which formulates user-based knowledge; the BIM Design Model, which provides required data for the assessment; and the Assessment Model (AM), which reasons the formulated knowledge into design features. The model was implemented in a prototype, using object-oriented programming in a C# application. The prototype was developed using .NET Framework as a plug-in to BIM software, Revit, to operate on the design models created. The prototype was tested using typical design case studies, which have proved its usefulness in informing constructability decision-making. The process also enabled the exploration and evaluation of what-if scenarios in design iterations, and construction methods. A developed BIM-based constructability assessment model was validated through different approaches, including interviews with experienced practitioners and a focus group comprising experts from industry and academia. As a result, the model has been found to provide the capability to represent constructability assessment knowledge within its Constructability Model. In addition, it demonstrated the ability to employ the knowledge-bases produced to reason about the constructability of alternative designs. Furthermore, practitioners have confirmed that the model is highly applicable in the industry and greatly needed to improve the practice of designing for constructability. The research concludes that the introduced assessment framework effectively enables modelling of buildings' design constructability. The implemented prototype is found to provide qualities lacking in current constructability tools. These include the qualities of being generic, scalable, flexible, comprehensive (both quantitatively and qualitatively), simple to use, accurate, and effective in delivering meaningful results that enable constructability improvement. In addition, the separation between knowledge acquisition and knowledge reasoning processes simplifies the assessment procedure and saves the user time and effort. It allows for the reuse of formulated knowledge (i.e. , CM) to model the constructability of multiple designs and at different stages. It also eliminates any potential bias that could arise during constructability assessment, given the subjectivity of the problem. Furthermore, the use of the BIM-based assessment tool automates the process and delivers an instant feedback on constructability performance.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | constructability; construction method; design process; focus group; interview; programming; reasoning; reuse; stakeholders |
| Index terms: | implementation, modelling, construction industry, constructability, return on investment, academia, knowledge acquisition, empirical study, designer, case study, practitioner, programming, bias, exploration, decision-making, construction method, subjectivity, prototype, design change, design process, design model, focus group, routine, reasoning, interview |
| Subjects: | programming, human factors and perception, practitioner, contractual arrangements, economic analysis, analytical methods, environmental resource management, design process, research methods, cognitive psychology, building construction, design methods, profession, data collection methods, modelling and simulation, probability and distributions, construction integration, industry analysis, student development, sociology, decision analysis, educational institutions |
| Topics: | Education, Engineering Principles, Procurement, Sustainability, Risk Management, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Site Management, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here