Flynn, C (2020) Risk transfer in operational public private partnerships in the education sector. PhD thesis, Queen's University Belfast, UK.
Abstract
Despite risk transfer being deemed a key driver in attaining value for money in Public Private Partnerships (PPPs), plus the substantial resources already committed to PPPs globally, prior studies have tended to focus on PPP procurement, projects in their early stages or on the accounting treatment of PPPs, with limited research being conducted on risk transfer in operational PPPs. There is also a dearth of comparative investigations into risk allocation in PPP and traditionally procured (TP) projects. Drawing on Principal Agent Theory, Lonsdale’s modified Transaction Cost Economics framework, relational contracting and the relational theory of risk this research sought to address this gap by examining whether risks have been transferred as intended. Planned levels of risk allocation were identified by analysing the procurement documents for a sample of operational PPP and TP schools in NI and ROI. In addition, semi-structured interviews were conducted with key public and private sector stakeholders to capture their experiences and perceptions of risk allocation at the operational stage of PPP and TP school projects. As anticipated, risks largely remained with the public sector for the TP schools examined. However, as interviewees’ responses regarding risk allocation in PPP schools differed somewhat from the analysis of the procurement documentation and the findings from prior studies, the results of this research challenge the technicist view of risk which contends that it can be transferred and priced. Variation between expected versus actual risk allocation appears to be as a consequence of contract subjectivity and flexibility, which is associated with relational contracting, together with disparities in contract knowledge, one of Lonsdale’s factors. Examples of good practice, recommendations for policy makers and suggested areas for future research were also identified.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | flexibility; private sector; subjectivity; transaction cost; value for money; schools; documentation; policy; public private partnerships; public sector; relational contracting; partnership; stakeholder; interview |
| Index terms: | relational contracting, partnership, private sector, good practice, public sector, investigation, risk allocation, disparity, public private partnership, interview, transaction cost, drawing, subjectivity, documentation, variation, documents, accounting, agent, value-for-money |
| Subjects: | evaluation, financial risk, financial analysis, social justice, practitioner, human factors and perception, contractual arrangements, economic analysis, contractual condition, professional development, performance measurement, industry analysis, administrative law, partnership management, data collection methods, technical documentation |
| Topics: | Procurement, Value Management, Quality Management, Ethics, Legal Issues, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Information Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Contract Administration, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here