Guadalupe, H (2020) Safety design management processes to mitigate design errors. PhD thesis, Walden University, USA.
Abstract
Some organizations lack processes to mitigate design errors that may result in potential accidents or loss of life during building construction. Managers are concerned about preventing injuries and accidents, which may promote safer working conditions during construction. Grounded in the transformation-flow-value theory of production, the purpose of this qualitative single case study was to explore safety design management processes that managers use to mitigate errors. The participants included 7 members from 1 design firm with business operations in the United States northeastern region. Data were collected from semistructured interviews and company document reviews. Data were analyzed using Yin's 5-phase, where 5 themes emerged: developing standardized processes and procedures, collaboration and information sharing, active senior management involvement, allocating technical design experts, and leveraging technology implementation. The key recommendation for building design managers is to develop and implement a systemic and systematic approach to establish detailed communication protocols to improve the design management processes to mitigate design errors. The implications for positive social change include promoting safer and healthier working environments to protect workers' well-being and increase community residents' living standards.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Blum, D and Simon, M |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building design; collaboration; communication; standards; working conditions; design management; safety; case study; interview; United States |
| Index terms: | working conditions, implementation, information sharing, building design, design firm, design error, case study, collaboration, design management, well-being, building construction, interview, manager, United States, transformation-flow-value theory, injury, design management process |
| Subjects: | data exchange, management, employment law, health conditions and diseases, mental health and wellbeing, data collection methods, production economics, design process, Geography, building construction, organization, practitioner, architectural design, professional practice, contractual arrangements |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Procurement, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here