Huang, J (2020) Infrastructure, the economy and policy. PhD thesis, University of Oxford, UK.
Abstract
The role of infrastructure in economic growth and development has been the subject of continued debate, yet no consensus has been achieved in the literature. This thesis examines the economic effect of infrastructure based on new evidence from China. We add to understanding of this complex phenomenon by focussing at micro levels, i.e., firm-level and household level with a focus on three critical infrastructure sectors: transport, renewable energy and information communication technologies. We employ a series of datasets on infrastructure, firm performance, and household economy from China in our examinations. Our first empirical study focuses on the economic effects of city’s ICT infrastructure on firm performance. We have found that the improvement of city’s ICT infrastructure positively improved firm’s profitability, marketing, and innovation. By taking advantage of an exogenous variation of city’s ICT using the telecommunication upgrade as a natural experiment, we establish the causal impact of city’s ICT infrastructure on firm profitability. We also identify the mechanisms in which ICTs impact firm performance, including the firm’s efficiency, firm’s labour, and firm cost. Our second empirical study focuses on the renewable energy sector and its influence on China’s rural household economy over the past two decades. We provide empirical evidence in this under-investigated area of research, and have found that renewable energy, including bioenergy, solar energy, and hydropower energy, indeed improved the rural household economy in China. In the third empirical study, we then focus on the impact of improved transport infrastructure connectivity on the litigation risks of listed firms in China. Based on a natural experiment on China’s highspeed rail system construction, we have found that the improvement of transport infrastructure connectivity reduced firm’s litigation risks. This study shows that the impact of improved transport connectivity on listed firms’ litigation risk stem from the reduction of information asymmetry, and also the increase of external regulations and monitoring. Overall, we have found evidence that transport infrastructure, renewable energy infrastructure and ICT infrastructure played a positive and critical role in the economic development from the perspectives of firm performance and household economy, and also provide in-depth analysis of the underlying mechanisms. The findings in this thesis offer evidence for policymakers that improvement of infrastructure contributes to the productivity, economic growth and social development, and reasonable deployment of infrastructure could pay off.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | economic development; economic growth; renewable energy; communication; innovation; litigation; marketing; monitoring; policy; China; experiment; productivity; regulation |
| Index terms: | experiment, transport infrastructure, renewable energy infrastructure, information asymmetry, connectivity, solar energy, economic development, renewable energy, China, dataset, telecommunication, regulation, evidence, variation, litigation, productivity, firm performance, efficiency, critical infrastructure, economic growth, profitability, marketing, empirical study, household, monitoring |
| Subjects: | contractual condition, performance management, management, political science, infrastructure and transport systems, data management, control systems, dispute resolution, business, data collection methods, energy systems, communication, Geography, business analysis, research methods, economic development, demography, networking, transaction economics, evaluation and assessment methods, economic analysis |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Quality Management, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Sustainability, Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Contract Administration, Site Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Governance |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here