Ittmann, J T (2020) Liability of the structural engineer: Establishing, quantifying, and managing risks. PhD thesis, Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College, USA.
Abstract
Liability is an important topic to all practicing professionals—including practicing engineers. However, the topic of liability does not receive the necessary attention required relative to other professions. Further, engineers that desire to learn more about liability in relation to their practice do not have many university options within an engineering curriculum or from outside materials available to a non-legally trained engineer. The goal of the study is to provide a comprehensive overview of liability directed towards an intelligent practicing engineer, while avoiding unnecessary over-simplification of the material. This study initially provides an in depth survey of the legal standard of care for a structural engineer – i.e. a major factor in determining whether liability is established in a case involving engineering fault. Next, the study reviews the extent to which an engineer can be personally liable if conduct giving rise to liability is established. This study examines the personal liability of an engineer in several different forms of practice, as well as reviewing the implications (or lack thereof) for sealing or failing to properly seal plans. Finally, this study provides an in-depth examination of a common technique used to manage risk through contract terms and conditions. This technique is negotiating a clause into the service agreement which limits liability. Courts will generally enforce these limitation of liability clauses, but there are many circumstances in which they will be deemed void.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Okeil, A |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | liability; contract terms; structural engineer; professional |
| Index terms: | structural engineer, negotiating, liability, survey, profession, simplification, option, contract term, engineer |
| Subjects: | conflict resolution, decision analysis, management, contractual condition, profession, data collection methods, liability law, institututions |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Contract Administration, Risk Management, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here