Platten, A and Gorse, C (2010) Supply chain development for major public sector projects. In: Egbu, C (ed.) Proceedings of 26th Annual ARCOM Conference, 6-8 September 2010, Leeds, UK.
Abstract
The procurement and implementation of major public sector projects and in particular those focusing upon the regeneration of the former industrial towns of the North of England present one the main drivers for change and innovation in the construction industry. In a period of reducing economic activity, projects of this nature have become a significant financial driver of the sector. A particular focus of the study is placed upon the procurement processes as they relate to best practice and the achievement of sustainable solutions in the supply chain. Further, the balance between the achievement of project objectives and their social impact are reviewed. The study includes a case study review of the approaches adopted in the education, health and housing sectors. Examples of procurement methods and performance management processes are presented as they relate to the achievement of the project objectives. This review also includes examples of how supply chains can be developed and managed. The outcomes of the study underline the requirement for clear leadership, effective communication and process integration based upon a performance management approach. The study recommends that performance management should be seen as a process of both reporting and learning, wherein activities that address skills gaps, the encouragement of reflective practice and opportunities for innovation are recommended.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | regeneration; supply chain management; performance management |
| Index terms: | encouragement, public sector, procurement process, case study, reflective practice, procurement method, performance management, England, social impact, housing, construction industry, implementation, economic activity, best practice, integration |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, administrative law, sociology, organizational analysis, professional development, Geography, performance measurement, management, economic analysis, contractual arrangements, business, construction type, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Procurement, Construction Technology, Business Strategy, Information Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Legal Issues, Human Resources, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here