Business model innovation for green urban infrastructure

McGinty, L N (2020) Business model innovation for green urban infrastructure. PhD thesis, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Abstract

Increasing population density, air pollution, and climate change put pressure on urban areas. Green infrastructure (GI) is increasingly recognised as a means to address these issues. However, piecemeal and asset-focused delivery, can limit the realisation of potential benefits. The vision for a comprehensive GI network which functions as a true interconnected infrastructure system, is one delivered at city-scale with an overarching strategic plan. Existing approaches are inadequate to deliver this, due to the lack of effective business models to join up stakeholders and value streams. Using a case study of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, this thesis shows that new and innovative business models (plans for how a GI system is delivered, who uses it and how it is financed and managed) are needed to enable the delivery of a city-scale GI vision. Effective business models for collaborative GI delivery will be where values (derived from benefit evaluation), stakeholders, and policy context intersect. The value of GI is its environmental, financial and social benefits to humans. Testing evaluation approaches finds that values should be weighted according to relevance, and that functionality across the whole system should be considered. The policy context informs the power and governance structures that underpin GI delivery. A power relationship analysis is used to identify key enablers, opportunities and barriers. In particular, local plans and policies have the greatest potential to support GI delivery demonstrating the need to create a GI strategy at city-scale. Stakeholders may supply or benefit from the GI, or both, and this circular relationship is a key opportunity for GI delivery. Where stakeholder interests intersect with GI values, the value proposition can be found; where they intersect with the policy context will be the power-holders and governance bodies needed to support GI delivery. Where the policy and values overlap are the key drivers for the project. This research found that working in the value-stakeholder-policy intersection, developing business models that use collaborative co-production approaches, provides the best opportunity to achieve the vision for an effective, interconnected and strategically delivered GI system.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Uncontrolled Keywords: population; climate change; governance; innovation; policy; pollution; urban infrastructure; UK; case study; business model; stakeholder
Index terms: social benefit, air pollution, urban infrastructure, functionality, strategy, population, co-production, urban area, climate change, governance, case study, pollution, density, green infrastructure, business model, value stream, testing
Subjects: environmental health, infrastructure and transport systems, management, sustainability and resilience, business, data collection methods, demography, urban form and morphology, theoretical framing, analytical methods, professional practice, design features, climate science, innovation studies
Topics: Urban Studies, Design Practice, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Governance, Value Management, Engineering Principles, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here