Mihov, M (2020) Making it fit: The role of institutional work in the transplantation of the anglo-saxon public-private partnership model to Germany. PhD thesis, King's College London, UK.
Abstract
In the 1990s, the United Kingdom (UK) developed the Private Finance Initiative (PFI), a form of long-term cooperation between the public and private sectors for the joint planning, delivery and maintenance of public building infrastructure. In the years that followed, this model has been a source of inspiration for many countries in Europe, including for Germany. In fact, in the early 2000s German policymakers attempted to establish a Public-Private Partnership (PPP) model based on the UK PFI. However, almost two decades later the German PPP model significantly differs from what the early adopters had imagined. Therefore, the question arises: to what extent have German national institutional idiosyncrasies adapted the Anglo-Saxon PPP concept? Combining the literatures on institutional transplantation (De Jong, Lalenis and Mamadouh, 2002) and institutional work (Lawrence and Suddaby, 2006), this thesis provides a novel theoretical framework to understand the impact of bottom-up agency on transplantation processes. Based on 52 in-depth interviews with German public and private infrastructure actors and a variety of supporting documents, this thesis argues that institutionally embedded actors in Germany have transformed the Anglo-Saxon PPP model to make it fit the German political economy. Contrary to the institutional transplantation view, the adoption of the PPP transplant in Germany has not been the result of policymakers piecing together a suitable PPP model; but the outcome of various activities of multiple public and private actors aiming to create, maintain and disrupt institutions in the German public infrastructure field. This thesis reveals that the transplantation process of PPPs in Germany occurred in three distinct phases - implantation, irritation and transcendence - during which key actors performed regulative, normative and cognitive work sequentially. This sequence of institutional work generated a PPP adoption process with unintended effects, ultimately resulting in a hybrid version of the Anglo-Saxon PPP model in Germany. The findings encourage further research on bottom-up activities of embedded actors to better understand the institutional dynamics of PPP adoption and more broadly, of transplantation processes.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | political economy; partnership; private finance initiative; public infrastructure; Europe; Germany; UK; United Kingdom; private sector; interview |
| Index terms: | Germany, public infrastructure, agency, institutional work, public building, private finance initiative, United Kingdom, Europe, dynamics, partnership, interview, documents, cooperation, political economy, private sector |
| Subjects: | psychology, contractual arrangements, data collection methods, professional development, infrastructure and transport systems, physical geography and landforms, systems engineering, Geography, economic and policy analysis, industry analysis, sociology, construction type, partnership management |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Procurement, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Information Management, Geographical Context |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here