Mirahadi, S (2020) EvacuSafe: A smart evacuation management system for buildings. PhD thesis, University of Toronto, Canada.
Abstract
Tall buildings and their occupants are highly sensitive to emergencies. Decision-making in these situations is complicated due to high population densities residing in these dwellings, complexity of emergency management strategies, significance of quick response in these cases, and unknown reactions of occupants under stress. This research develops an evacuation management system (EMS), named EvacuSafe, to support decision-making and crowd handling during evacuations. EvacuSafe supports a fully automated process of detecting the fire, simulating the growth pattern of the hazard, generating multiple strategies of evacuation, evaluating the strategies based on the risk to evacuees, and finally guiding evacuees along their egress route. EvacuSafe’s architecture consists of the three main modules of fire dynamics simulation, agent-based crowd simulation, and graph search path-planning. EvacuSafe is model-centric, and the entire data storage and data transfer between its three modules are based on Building Information Modelling (BIM) and Industry Foundation Classes (IFC). By integrating BIM, agent-based crowd simulation, and fire simulation, EvacuSafe enables a performance-based evaluation of building evacuations for different building designs. In real-time mode, EvacuSafe converts BIM to a Geometric Network Graph (GNG) and performs path-planning and guidance during emergencies. In addition, the guidance system in EvacuSafe is based on the application of Adaptive Dynamic Signage System (ADSS). This research aims for a smart emergency management system that will be less restricted by human factors and more efficient in saving the lives of occupants in emergencies.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | McCabe, B |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | complexity; population; dwellings; building information modelling; decision making; industry foundation classes; simulation; building design; evacuation |
| Index terms: | density, building design, building information modelling, automated process, dynamics, industry foundation classes, module, tall building, data storage, management system, strategy, decision-making, population, emergency management, agent, complexity, performance-based, human factor |
| Subjects: | architectural elements, automation and robotics, financial risk, demography, computational design, construction type, practitioner, analytical methods, architectural design, management, performance measurement, occupational health and safety management, data management, decision analysis, information systems, systems engineering |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety, Risk Management, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Design Practice, Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Construction Technology, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here