Morkan, B (2020) Unexpected events in mega construction projects: Responding to unexpected events through multi-stakeholder strategies. PhD thesis, Stevens Institute of Technology, USA.
Abstract
Project management is critical to the planning and success of any project. However, unexpected events do occur, and limited information is available of how to deal with such unexpected events. There has been some research in recent years on management of unexpected events in projects, but it has typically been conducted from the perspective of the project manager and the project management team. For the most part this literature assumes that it is the project manager's responsibility to find solutions and courses of action in an endeavor to mitigate the negative effects of unexpected events in projects. However, unexpected events cannot always be resolved by one stakeholder. There is little prior knowledge about how different project stakeholder groups take actions voluntarily to accommodate unexpected events. The aim of this study is to research how voluntary stakeholder actions can lead to effective responses to unexpected events. The setting is the mega-construction project of the Vodafone Arena Stadium (VAS) in Istanbul, Turkey. The research design follows an inductive, discovery-oriented grounded theory approach. Primary data were gathered through semi-structured in-depth interviews with a sample of 20 project stakeholders who represented 15 different stakeholder groups. We find that stakeholders are able to minimize negative consequences of unexpected events using four voluntary stakeholder strategies. We further identify three properties that differentiate these categories, as well as antecedents of voluntary stakeholder actions, and discuss implications for the management of mega projects. Our findings suggest that voluntary actions of various stakeholders can lead to effective responses to unexpected events. This study advances project stakeholder research, unexpected event management and construction management research both theoretically and empirically.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Holahan, P J |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | grounded theory; construction project; project manager; project stakeholder; stakeholders; Turkey; interview |
| Index terms: | project manager, Turkey, grounded theory, research design, project management, management research, interview, strategy, project management team, project stakeholder, construction project, Istanbul |
| Subjects: | profession, data collection methods, research design and methodology, project management theory and practice, management, sociology, Geography, production management, theoretical framing |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here