Abdenour, J I (2021) A cost estimation model for improving the budget estimates of industrial plant construction projects. DEng thesis, George Washington University, USA.
Abstract
It is well established that construction projects do not meet their cost budgets. Part of the problem is because cost budgets are not based on definitive cost estimates that are founded on detailed design and engineering, but rather they are based on preliminary cost estimates prepared when the level of project definition is less than 40% at its best. While the expected accuracy range of preliminary cost estimates is between -20% to +30%, past research found that on average over 85% of estimates come closer to the higher end of accuracy range at 28%. This praxis introduces a multiple linear regression model that utilizes some of the project cost elements to estimate its construction cost. This new hybrid (stochastic/deterministic) cost estimation method improves the preliminary cost estimates of industrial plant construction projects. The new model can estimate construction costs within 15% accuracy, which is comparable to results from definitive cost estimates, yet at less than 40% project definition. While definitive cost estimates require detailed project definition for a full set of 15 cost elements, the new model requires only 3, site works, electrical works and auxiliary equipment works. It can be applied earlier in the life of the project to compute improved preliminary cost estimates, providing the project stakeholders with more accurate cost budgets. The model was developed using 32 definitive cost estimates, for small industrial plant projects under US$50 million, and their actual construction costs. It was tested using 4 different datasets reserved for model validation. It has an R2(adj) and R2 (pred) of 82.34% and 79.41% respectively, and an overall regression p-value of 0.000.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Sakani, S and Fossaceca, J |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | accuracy; construction cost; construction project; cost estimation; equipment; project cost; site work; stakeholders |
| Index terms: | site work, praxis, estimate, cost estimate, regression model, construction cost, project stakeholder, validation, construction project, dataset, cost estimating, accuracy, project cost |
| Subjects: | reflexivity, production management, site logistics, professional development, economics, statistical analysis, sociology, data management, financial and cost management |
| Topics: | Site Management, Digital Applications, Stakeholder Management, Information Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here