Amankona, D (2021) Socio-ecological impacts and adaptations arising from Chinese-led infrastructure developments in Africa: A case study of the BUI hydropower dam in Ghana. PhD thesis, Open University, UK.
Abstract
China has become the most important global funder of large hydropower dams over the last two decades, offering development opportunities for Global South countries. However, hydropower dams can negatively affect surrounding communities and ecosystems. There are widespread allegations that China’s poor record on social and environmental standards stems from their chosen financing models and construction practices.Drawing on social-ecological systems (SES) thinking and critical political ecology, this study investigates these issues through a qualitative study of Ghana’s Bui Dam. It uses a rapid ethnographic methodology and data from secondary sources, in-depth interviews, key informant interviews, focus group discussions, and transect walks.The study found that the dam has significantly changed river flow, soil characteristics, and the local ecosystem. This has affected how local communities organise their lifestyles and relationships to their local resource base, with serious implications for their welfare. Negative social impacts include water-borne diseases, displacement, and livelihood disruption. Livelihood diversification has become an important adaptation option. The dam has also wrought positive changes including the provision of modern houses, improved roads, potable water, expanded markets, growth in the tourism and hospitality sectors, upgraded healthcare, and increased access to electricity for resettled communities and Bui Dam staff.The dam’s impacts vary across spatial scales. Livelihood disruption is more severe for communities downstream and in the floodplains. Upstream communities have experienced phenomenal growth in the fisheries and trading sectors while farming remains profitable. In sum, the dam has brought new livelihood opportunities, eroded others, and brought some into conflict.Overall, the ‘China factor’ does not render the Bui dam unique among African dam projects. However, Chinese actors were only able to meet their geopolitical and geoeconomic interests in constructing the dam by working through the agency of the Ghanaian state. The Chinese government facilitated access for Sinohydro via Chinese state capital while Ghana’s political elites negotiated the investment deal and engineering contract. As such, Ghanaian state institutions made key decisions that shaped the dam’s socio-ecological impacts.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Mohan, G and Collins, K |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | market; social impact; healthcare; standards; dam project; diversification; financing; government; investment; markets; China; Ghana; case study; focus group; interview |
| Index terms: | option, drawing, funder, Ghana, financing, tourism, methodology, social impact, interview, case study, dam project, qualitative study, lifestyle, diversification, social-ecological system, markets, infrastructure development, Africa, hospitality, focus group, agency, adaptation, ecology, China |
| Subjects: | decision analysis, industry analysis, sociology, practitioner, economic analysis, market analysis, research design and methodology, infrastructure engineering, regions and continents, environmental science, research methods, technical documentation, Geography, demography, data collection methods, infrastructure and transport systems, user focus |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Urban Studies, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Research Practice, Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Geographical Context |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here