A post-construction evaluation of long-term success in LEED-certified residential communities

Goodarzi, M (2021) A post-construction evaluation of long-term success in LEED-certified residential communities. PhD thesis, Michigan State University, USA.

Abstract

Project success has been the focus of several studies and traditionally, the iron triangle factors (time, cost, and scope) have been the focus in evaluating project success. However recently, the importance of the long-term evaluation of project success has been highlighted, which evaluates the successful performance of the projects at the post-construction stage with a focus on three main aspects of sustainability, satisfaction, and life cycle performance. This study evaluates multiple aspects of long-term project success by setting sustainability as the baseline and finding the relationships between the performance of the built environment and residential satisfaction in sustainable residential communities. This study was conducted in two phases; in the first phase, the relationship between the actual performance of infrastructure and sustainability of LEED-certified residential communities was evaluated to compare the consistency of sustainability evaluation criteria in theory and practice. In the second phase, the perceived performance of the discussed infrastructure attributes as well as several building and neighborhood attributes were evaluated to understand their relationships with residential satisfaction and test the consistency of sustainability evaluation criteria with people’s perception and judgments in determining the long-term success of these projects. The data for the first phase of the research was collected from www. usgbc. org and walkscore. com and in the second phase, an online survey was conducted to collect data from the residents of LEED-certified residential communities as the experiment group (n=192) and the residents of conventional residential communities as the control group (n=183). The first phase of this study used a multiple regression analysis to evaluate the relationship between infrastructure performance and sustainability. In the second phase, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed to validate the measurement model. A structural equation modeling (SEM) was then conducted to evaluate the relationships between the perceived performance of the built environment and residential satisfaction. The most influential attributes in determining residential satisfaction were then determined through path analyses and finally, a multiple-group CFA (MGCFA) was carried out to evaluate the effect of sustainability on the perceived performance of the built environment and residential satisfaction. As one of the important findings of this study, it was indicated that evaluation of factors such as walking infrastructure that is considered as an important criterion in determining sustainability shows discrepancy in theory and practice. Besides, LEED-certified community residents illustrated the very high importance of this factor in determining satisfaction. This finding highlighted the importance of considering the users' perceptions and judgments in developing sustainability standards. This study contributes to the body of knowledge by developing a comprehensive post-construction evaluation model that considers multiple aspects of the long-term project success by including the feedback and judgments of residents regarding their living environment. The findings of this research can be beneficial for the improvement of housing and community sustainability standards by including the users' opinions in decision-making.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Berghorn, G H
Uncontrolled Keywords: built environment; measurement; residential; sustainability; standards; feedback; life cycle; project success; experiment; factor analysis; multiple regression; regression analysis
Index terms: built environment, structural equation modelling, multiple regression analysis, satisfaction, life cycle, body of knowledge, residential satisfaction, regression analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, housing, multiple-regression, factor analysis, path analysis, experiment, survey, project success, decision-making, judgment, sustainability standard
Subjects: dispute resolution, statistical analysis, knowledge management, value management, project management theory and practice, economic analysis, project delivery, decision analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, construction type, data collection methods, sustainability assessment
Topics: Sustainability, Urban Studies, Legal Issues, Research Practice, Information Management, Project Management, Risk Management, Business Strategy, Construction Technology
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here