Keskin, F S (2021) Integration of lifecycle assessment into structural intervention scenarios for assessing environmental impacts of vulnerable buildings. PhD thesis, University of Birmingham, UK.
Abstract
Recent developments in the construction industry have led to a growing awareness about sustainable buildings. However, due to negligence in building construction, including inadequate building regulations and incorrect design, structural integrity remains a primary issue of the construction sector. Furthermore, an increasing number of disasters in recent years is another critical factor that has triggered a rise in the number of existing vulnerable buildings. Thus, building durability must become a priority factor required to 'sustain' buildings. However, current studies on structural strengthening mostly focus on only one aspect of building performance without referring to the interrelation between the multiplicities of design, construction, and maintenance deficiencies. This research aims to examine the improvement of vulnerable buildings; not only in terms of structural performance but also in consideration of a wider set of sustainability challenges. Therefore, this study proposes an integrated and sustainable structural intervention method for vulnerable buildings. The method is based on the concept of structural intervention, which refers to structural retrofitting and reconstruction of buildings. Using this concept, sustainability metrics are expanded beyond environmental impacts throughout design and service life of buildings to also include a reduction in structure vulnerability and inefficient use of resources. The proposed method is based on scenarios that refer to the scale of damage inflicted on vulnerable buildings. The scenarios' sustainable performance is evaluated by using Life Cycle Analysis, which includes life cycle inventory analysis and life cycle impact assessment. The LCA concept is adapted and reshaped to make it specifically tailored to vulnerable buildings by covering the entire life cycle of scenarios, also referred to herein as, customised stages. The method was applied to two case studies of vulnerable buildings with low and medium damage, each constructed according to different local and national building codes. Results of the study suggest that the fulfilment of sustainability criteria in buildings can be significantly improved by implementing the sustainable structural intervention method. Findings indicate that avoiding new build construction by strengthening the structure of existing vulnerable buildings can decrease construction-related environmental burdens and overuse of resources. Further, it was found that although embodied environmental effects have a lesser impact than a building's operational impacts, reducing them also help conserve natural resources. Additionally, the use of recyclable strengthening materials contributes to both the reduction of resource demand and environmental impacts. The service life also has a considerable impact on results when comparing the total and annual environmental impacts of intervention scenarios. Since the strengthening techniques are unique and the design options are limited, the environmental impacts should be evaluated on a project basis and the proposed method should be followed accordingly. The method can serve as a reference for the sustainable transformation of the vulnerable building stocks, and it can be further improved for regional building regulations.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | durability; negligence; sustainability; new build; building performance; integration; service life; life cycle analysis; case study; building stock; building regulation; environmental impact; sustainable building |
| Index terms: | case study, building regulation, inventory, reconstruction, life cycle impact assessment, service life, new build, critical factor, natural resource, transformation, integrity, life cycle, durability, lifecycle, option, environmental effect, construction industry, sustainability challenge, negligence, life cycle analysis, building construction, building performance, building stock, strengthening, vulnerability, environmental impact, sustainable building, integration, retrofitting, construction sector, building code |
| Subjects: | renovation and retrofit, construction integration, industry analysis, regulatory law, organizational analysis, decision analysis, value management, data collection methods, risk assessment, business, project delivery, material degradation and durability, inventory management, health safety and environment, sustainable construction, structural engineering, environmental hazards, liability law, quality assurance, building construction, asset management, environmental impact, environmental issues, environmental resource management |
| Topics: | Supply Chain Management, Quality Management, Legal Issues, Sustainability, Risk Management, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Health and Safety, Organizational Design, Construction Technology, Construction Materials, Research Practice, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here