Excavation health and safety (H&S): A South African perspective

Smallwood, J J (2010) Excavation health and safety (H&S): A South African perspective. In: Egbu, C (ed.) Proceedings of 26th Annual ARCOM Conference, 6-8 September 2010, Leeds, UK.

Abstract

A range of H&S hazards exist relative to excavations. Furthermore, excavations occur in the elements and are exposed to a range of non-activity influences such as passing vehicles. Excavations also impact on the stability of adjacent structures and buildings, and temporary plant. International research indicates the primary barriers to excavation H&S to be: casual attitude; failure to provide trench protection; lack of daily inspections by competent persons; lack of training; inadequate enforcement, and costs. The paper reports on a study conducted among excavation H&S seminar delegates using a structured questionnaire. Selected findings include: barricading is ranked first in terms of the frequency interventions are undertaken relative to excavations, and scientific design of shoring last; relative to excavations the South African construction industry is rated below average relative to geo-technical reports, training, education, design of shoring, and culture; the South African construction industry is rated marginally below average in terms of excavation H&S, time pressure predominates in terms of barriers to excavation H&S excavation H&S requires a multi-stakeholder effort, and excavation H&S training predominates in terms of the extent interventions could contribute to an improvement in excavation H&S. Conclusions include: a scientific approach is not adopted relative to excavation H&S a multi-stakeholder effort is required, and education and training is a pre-requisite for improving excavation H&S.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: excavations; health and safety
Index terms: questionnaire, excavation, enforcement, construction industry, education and training, health and safety, stability, inspection
Subjects: structural engineering, health safety and environment, professional education, industry analysis, quality assurance, data collection methods, construction operations
Topics: Quality Management, Education, Site Management, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here