McCausland, K (2021) The design, development and evaluation of GIS applications as decision support tools for ecologically aware infrastructure design. EngD thesis, University of Reading, UK.
Abstract
The overall aim of this thesis was to critically evaluate how GIS can be applied to facilitate large infrastructure companies to reduce their impacts on biodiversity during the planning, design, construction of large infrastructure projects. The research was undertaken from the perspective of an infrastructure contractor, precisely the sponsor company, Costain Group Plc. The research aim was achieved through the development of geospatial applications to inform infrastructure design whilst adhering to national biodiversity initiatives in a construction design context. The most relevant initiative is 'no net loss', which calculates biodiversity value in units using a metric calculation by Defra (Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs). However, these metrics face criticism for over-simplifying the complexity of the natural world, in particular the neglect of the impact of fragmentation on habitats. At present, the stages of construction do not require an initial scoping of protected and managed land, and there are no statutory requirements for reducing biodiversity loss beyond the identification of invasive species. The relevant stages of construction development for a contractor are the Concept and Developed Design, which is the contextual focus of the applications developed using GIS, referred to as the GIS simulations in this thesis. The GIS simulations include the establishment of baselines for key habitats and species, which form part of the Biodiversity Action Plan, identified as a key environmental planning procedure within the sponsor company. The GIS simulations successfully visualised baseline data. The Developed Design, which involves the refinement of the Concept Design and associated strategies, identifies the geographical placement of the design. Based on this placement, spatial planning methods were used to calculate the changes in biodiversity unit values. The applications were successfully developed, but it was recommended that changes in biodiversity unit value need to include condition, obtained through surveying, before visualising impacts. In addition, specific parameters need to be justified for implementation of the approach at different sites; these can be established based on the project type, the size of the site, and local target species. The applications are considered feasible for implementation within the sponsor company, however, there needs to be more drive from the business and client to invest in more sustainable alternatives moving forward.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Griffiths, G; Nikolic, D and Whyte, J |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | complexity; decision support; fragmentation; client; infrastructure project; simulation |
| Index terms: | face, surveying, implementation, land, strategy, complexity, large infrastructure project, infrastructure project, spatial planning, fragmentation, biodiversity, construction development, concept design, decision support, placement |
| Subjects: | real estate economics, production management, management, design process, decision analysis, business, psychology, urban design, contractual arrangements, health monitoring assessment and metrics, systems engineering, infrastructure engineering, biodiversity, infrastructure and transport systems |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Sustainability, Procurement, Human Resources, Urban Studies, Health and Safety, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Organizational Design, Risk Management, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here