Murguia, D (2021) A model of systemic BIM adoption. PhD thesis, Loughborough University, UK.
Abstract
Systemic innovations require multiple interdependent actors to change their practices simultaneously to realise the benefits of the innovation. Building Information Modelling (BIM) has been classified as a systemic innovation that is adopted by projects, firms, and users. However, the slow diffusion of BIM in the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) sector has maintained the gap between BIM visions and actual BIM practice. Whilst some adoption surveys indicate that BIM is business as usual, anecdotal evidence suggests that the spread of BIM across supply chains is still limited. Notably, BIM is hardly used at the same level by all users and firms in a temporary project coalition. This uneven distribution of firm capabilities and user adoption hinders the desired outcome at the supply-chain level. This study investigates the systemic adoption of digital innovations and is aimed at formulating a model of systemic BIM adoption. To achieve this, relevant theories and influential factors were selected to formulate a conceptual model. A mixed-methods approach was selected to develop and validate the model. Data were collected and analysed using quantitative and qualitative evidence from BIM-enabled projects. This study extends the body of knowledge by presenting a multi-level model of systemic BIM adoption that holistically combines factors at the user, firm, project, and industry levels. The cross-level relationships provide novel insights into our understanding of systemic BIM adoption. The model is effective in providing a useful framework for policymakers to implement policies to accelerate wider adoption within supply chains. The model is particularly needed in a context where governments are planning to mandate BIM in construction. Further, systemic BIM adoption is the gateway for the digital construction industry. Therefore, the model would also provide a practical implementation framework as the industry progresses towards a digital mode of working and could underpin further digitalisation of the sector worldwide.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | firm capabilities; building information model; building information modelling; government; innovation; policy; information modelling |
| Index terms: | body of knowledge, firm capability, influential factor, evidence, survey, mandate, digitalization, implementation, systemic innovation, information modelling, building information modelling, digital construction |
| Subjects: | business, risk assessment, data collection methods, management, political science, information systems, evaluation and assessment methods, contractual arrangements, knowledge management, digital technology, digital design |
| Topics: | Procurement, Risk Management, Governance, Information Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here