Thorpe-Jones, E; Dainty, A and Fellows, R (2010) Enacting diversity and equality as part of CSR policy: An agenda for change. In: Egbu, C (ed.) Proceedings of 26th Annual ARCOM Conference, 6-8 September 2010, Leeds, UK.
Abstract
Over the past two decades there has been a vast amount of research into diversity and equality within the UK construction industry. This has produced a body of literature which highlights the ways in which the industry inhibits a diverse workforce, as well as beginning to suggest ways in which the homogeneity of the industry’s workforce might be addressed. Yet despite both this focus and the growing body of legislation enforcing equal opportunities, construction remains a predominately white, male-oriented and hegemonic industry. Given this apparent resistance to embracing the diversity agenda, an alternative strategy could be to incorporate diversity and equality within the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) agenda, particularly as this is a discourse which is currently gaining traction within many contracting and consulting organizations. This position paper critically reviews the CSR and diversity literatures, examining the extent to which CSR might provide a vehicle for enacting the diversity agenda and analyses its ability to make inroads in attracting, retaining and developing a diverse workforce. It is suggested that the transformative potential of CSR offers an alternative route through which diversity principles could be enacted within the industry; particularly with regard to consulting and contracting firms.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | corporate social responsibility; diversity; equality; business case |
| Index terms: | business case, corporate social responsibility, construction industry, traction, strategy, legislation, equal opportunity |
| Subjects: | strategic project management, legal systems, transportation engineering, industry analysis, management, health safety and environment |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Human Resources, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 CT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here