Al-Mhdawi, M K S (2022) Risk management of construction projects under extreme conditions: a case study of Iraq. PhD thesis, University of Southampton, UK.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has affected construction markets around the world, causing legislative changes, supply chain disruptions, and workforce restrictions. Construction industry stakeholders in developing countries are considered to be more susceptible to the challenges and emerging risks associated with the pandemic, exacerbated by poor risk management (RM) practices, undermining the successful delivery of construction projects. This thesis examines the impact of extreme conditions' risk management practices, the challenges associated with their implementation, and their emerging risks on the success of construction projects in developing countries by considering the Iraqi construction industry during the COVID-19 pandemic. This thesis encompasses three papers written as part of a PhD by publication (Three-Paper PhD), situated between introduction and conclusion chapters. The first paper focuses on identifying and assessing the main challenges and barriers to RM effective application in the construction industry during COVID-19 pandemic, and assesses the level of efficacy of current RM practices adopted by Iraqi construction practitioners. The second paper explores the key emergent COVID-19 risks for the construction industry and investigates their risk level. The final paper analyses the direct and indirect effects of emergent COVID-19 risks on the successful delivery of construction projects. Mixed (qualitative and quantitative) methods were used in each study to fulfil the objectives, including (1) semi-structured interview; (2) focus group discussion; (3) questionnaire survey; (4) fuzzy inference system; (5) analytical hierarchy process; and (6) structural equation modelling. The results show that the five most critical challenges and barriers to construction RM implementation in Iraq are: (1) bribery, (2) the complexity of quantitative-based risk assessment tools, (3) a lack of willingness for collaboration among stakeholders, (4) time-consuming processes, and (5) ineffective risk communication. Also, the results indicate low risk management practices in relation to the identified RM challenges and barriers and their categories. The RM practices as average values on a scale of 0.1 to 1.0 (with 0.1 representing very poor RM practices efficacy and 1.0 representing very high RM practices efficacy) are as follows: (1) management-related challenges and barriers (0.4033), (2) team-related challenges and barriers (0.3766), (3) analytical approaches-related challenges and barriers (0.3393), and (4) behaviours-related challenges and barriers (0.3282). The results reveal that the most critical COVID-19 risks affecting the construction industry are (1) contract suspension, (2) contractor bankruptcy, (3) materials price escalation, (4) inappropriate risk allocation, and (5) claims arising under a construction contract. Furthermore, the results show that contractual implications-related risks have the strongest total effects on project success, followed by organisational implications-related risks, construction financial market-related risks, health and safety of the construction workforce-related risks, and supply chain operations-related risks, respectively. This research contributes to the body of knowledge by providing a foothold foundation for researchers and decision-makers to improve their understanding of the impact of the pandemic with its deep uncertainties in relation to developing countries. It can assist in the development of effective strategies to address RM implementation challenges and barriers, and extreme conditions' emerging risks, and ultimately enhance construction RM practices. Furthermore, understanding the nature of the relationship between the risks emerging from extreme conditions and project success should assist construction contractors in identifying the root causes of low-level project success; and in developing appropriate strategies for improving project success levels by addressing the direct and indirect effects of extreme conditions risks such as those of the COVID-19 pandemic.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Brito, M and Onggo, S |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | workforce; collaboration; communication; developing countries; health and safety; risk assessment; risk management; Iraq; structural equation modelling; analytical hierarchy process; case study; focus group; interview; questionnaire survey; stakeholder |
| Index terms: | COVID-19, developing country, interview, fuzzy inference, health and safety, focus group, structural equation modelling, strategy, survey, construction practitioner, collaboration, construction project, indirect effect, questionnaire, body of knowledge, construction contractor, complexity, publication, pandemic, case study, project success, risk assessment, risk allocation, construction contract, risk management, bankruptcy, construction industry, implementation, analytical hierarchy process, construction market |
| Subjects: | contractual arrangements, knowledge management, analytical methods, economic analysis, practitioner, research dissemination and communication, contract type, decision-making and optimization, market analysis, production management, health safety and environment, development economics, financial risk, data collection methods, risk assessment, industry analysis, statistical analysis, systems engineering, professional development, project management theory and practice, management, health risk and incident analysis |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Procurement, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Organizational Design, International Construction, Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Information Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here