Machine learning integrated portfolio-based strategic building asset management

Fang, Z (2022) Machine learning integrated portfolio-based strategic building asset management. PhD thesis, University College London, UK.

Abstract

The data for strategic asset management (SAM) contains multi-functional features and is usually built with a complex structure of attributes. Effective management and utilisation of the building data are essential for monitoring projects in a sustainable and whole lifecycle manner and avoiding potential risks for all the project stakeholders. A common challenge FM professionals face is exposure to an information-saturated and data-rich facility management environment. Yet, a limited amount of research has focused on quality and project portfolio-level management of the building data required for SAM services. Even fewer research studies have examined how building data migration, collection and management processes can benefit machine learning (ML) related technologies based on the existing unstructured project data. This thesis aims to explore how the facility management industry can improve portfolio-based strategic asset management/planning by applying ML algorithms in asset data collection and management processes. By applying an abductive research approach, this study first uses a case study approach to evaluate the current portfolio-based SAM practice and data quality. Then, the preliminary research outcome from more than ten different projects (21 for image classification and 12 for text classification) is gathered and further processed to evaluate the effectiveness of image and text classification applications over data collection and management processes of portfolio-based SAM. The preliminary findings from the case study confirm the challenges of current portfoliobased SAM, which include: (1) the lack of any guiding framework for SAM professionals to control their documentation flow; (2) data interoperability issues across different projects; (3) the lack of sufficient data entries for conducting some core SAM services, and; (4) the lack of utilising portfolio-based management intelligence to power the SAM decision making. It is found in the second phase study that deep-neural-based text and image classification algorithms are effective in supporting data interoperability and in remedying the lack of insufficient data attributes issue (e.g., the lack of 'manufacture' information) raised across the project portfolio. This is because the ML-enabled approach can provide an automated data collection solution, combined with the developed SAM information management frameworks and structures. This study contributes to the body of knowledge as it (1) both theoretically and empirically evaluates the data management in different aspects of effective portfolio-based SAM, (2) validates the applicability of applying deep-neural-based image and text classification algorithms for automated data migration, collection, and management processes and (3) develops a structure to bridge SAM documentation flow and ML applications.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Uncontrolled Keywords: bridge; asset management; data management; decision making; documentation; information management; interoperability; learning; lifecycle; migration; monitoring; case study; machine learning; professional; project stakeholder; stakeholder
Index terms: interoperability, effectiveness, lifecycle, monitoring, data interoperability, migration, data management, case study, machine learning, body of knowledge, exposure, project stakeholder, decision-making, documentation, asset management, project data, face
Subjects: control systems, data collection methods, project delivery, artificial intelligence, professional development, public and environmental health, data exchange, performance management, systems and processes, sociology, decision analysis, data management, knowledge management, psychology, asset management, demography
Topics: Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Site Management, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Risk Management, Project Management, Health and Safety, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here