Hunhevicz, J J (2022) Exploring the potential of blockchain and cryptoeconomics for the construction industry. DSc thesis, ETH Zürich, Switzerland.
Abstract
The construction industry needs to become more efficient and productive in order to cope with increasing housing and infrastructure demand, as well as problems associated with climate change. Digitalization is often seen as the solution for this transformative change, but so far, its anticipated impact did not materialize. The construction industry is complex and current project delivery fails to achieve the needed trusted collaboration, while also emphasizing extreme fragmentation. The resulting omnipresent trust issues also continue with digital coordination.Blockchain became increasingly popular in the last fourteen years. The technology shifts trust from middlemen and transacting parties towards the technical system. Moreover, smart contracts allow to code interaction logic with blockchain transactions for decentralized workflows. It is not surprising that a technology hyped as ``trust machine'' attracted attention from scholars as a way to improve trust in the troubled construction industry.This thesis aims to better understand the potential of blockchain for the construction industry. The focus lies on the under-researched aspect of cryptoeconomics, using smart contracts to encode institutional coordination.The first part of the thesis builds theoretical foundations to understand the promise of blockchain and cryptoeconomics for the construction industry. The thesis assesses the need for blockchain by matching technical capabilities with proposed use cases. Moreover, it outlines how cryptoeconomic mechanisms align with the industry structure, and finally conceptualizes how they can be applied to collaborative project deliveries trough a lens of Common Pool Resource theory.The second part of the thesis contains two proof of concepts that demonstrate the potential and feasibility of cryptoeconomics in the construction industry. The prototypes show new possibilities for blockchain-based cross-phase and cross-trade incentive mechanisms with performance based smart contracts, but also cryptoeconomic mechanisms for novel forms of coordination between humans and machines with no1s1 - a self-owning house.In summary, blockchain is interesting for applications in the construction industry that rely on cryptoeconomic mechanisms. They offer new possibilities to create incentives in interplay with the ongoing digitalization towards rethinking economic coordination in the construction industry. Common Pool Resource theory is a powerful lens to conceptualize such new forms of decentralized coordination. Furthermore, cyberphysical integration with blockchain enables economic machine participation. Finally, the research demonstrates that early prototyping of cryptoeconomic applications for the construction industry is already possible.Overall, this thesis investigates a novel research area at the interdisciplinary intersection of the construction industry, blockchain, and common pool resource theory. It extends the state-of-the-art research in construction management both with novel theoretical work and proof of concepts as a solid foundation for more research on blockchain and cryptoeconomics in the construction industry.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | blockchain; coordination; fragmentation; trust; foundations; climate change; collaboration; integration; participation; project delivery; workflow |
| Index terms: | state of the art, collaboration, integration, prototyping, housing, climate change, performance-based, workflow, digitalization, fragmentation, prototype, collaborative project, blockchain, coordination, project delivery, foundations, interaction, smart contract, construction industry |
| Subjects: | innovation and technology management, contractual arrangements, digital technology, climate science, research dissemination and communication, construction type, behavioral psychology, structural engineering, project delivery, modelling and simulation, computing systems, business, industry analysis, organizational analysis, management, performance measurement |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Engineering Principles, Procurement, Sustainability, Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here