Kašpar, H M P (2022) Robert Adam and networks for building in eighteenth-century Britain. PhD thesis, University of Leeds, UK.
Abstract
This doctoral thesis examines the work of the Scottish architects Robert Adam (1728-92) and James Adam (1732-94). Traditional interpretations tended to focus on style and biography, exploring the Adam brothers' creative autonomy as designers. Signalling a departure from this architect-centred approach, recent scholarship has contested the authority of architects and investigated the complex collaborative dynamics of building work. Engaging with current debates in the field, this thesis prioritises the Adam brothers' activities as surveyors, contractors and project-managers. It reframes their practice from a more logistical and economic perspective, examining their supervisory duties and subcontracting networks. Along a series of project milestones - estimating, contracting, measuring and payment - it tracks the Adam brothers' shifting involvement as work progressed. The management of large-scale building works demanded a sound grasp of materials, costs and production processes, combined with effective methods of long-distance communication and distribution. By mapping out networks of building activity, this thesis identifies the distinct challenges of supervising from a remove, and the complexities associated ... (continues)
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Bristol, K and Checketts, R |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | communication; estimating; payment; subcontracting; architect; designer; project manager |
| Index terms: | manager, designer, project manager, estimating, subcontracting, dynamics, duty, mapping, architect, production process, complexity |
| Subjects: | practitioner, manufacturing engineering, profession, financial and cost management, systems engineering, organization, contractual role, spatial and geospatial analysis |
| Topics: | Supply Chain Management, Cost Management, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Contract Administration, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here