Parker, M A (2022) Developing a performance index to measure soft skills on construction projects: a Delphi study. PhD thesis, Aston University, UK.
Abstract
Recent research suggests that project teams need to become more socially aware, particularly in how project professionals interact with one another, and that soft skills need to be assessed in the same way that the traditional 'iron triangle' of cost, time and quality are. At present they are either not measured at all or at best very poorly, despite being recognised for how important they are to project success. Four relevant theories were reviewed to identify where this research could make a contribution to each of them. In professional practice, the development of a soft skills performance measurement index would allow professional bodies to formally acknowledge the importance of soft skills measurement in their technical guidance for becoming professionally qualified. The research has a social constructionist ontology and primarily adopted an interpretivist epistemology. The methodology used a multi-phase mixed methods approach using the consensus-building research technique, the Delphi Method, collecting both qualitative and quantitative data in iterations. This approach enabled five soft skills (termed the 'performance pentagon') and a composite performance index (CPI) for construction projects to be derived. Mitigating actions were taken to keep participants engaged in each iteration, following the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic. The synthesis and modification of existing theories led to the phenomenon of measured goal interest (MGI), an original contribution to the academic literature on the subject, the term measured goal interest never having been used previously. The fact that both a major client and major consultancy in the UK construction sector have since permanently adopted the 'performance pentagon' soft skills within their own performance measurement models shows how successful this study has already been in making a contribution to professional practice.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction sector; measurement; skills; project success; client; UK; project team; construction project; professional |
| Index terms: | project team, epistemology, mixed method, becoming, composite, project success, performance measurement, pandemic, Delphi method, consultancy, professional practice, construction sector, construction project, methodology, ontology, building research, COVID-19 |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, project delivery, knowledge theory, professional development, project management theory and practice, education and knowledge transfer, health risk and incident analysis, performance measurement, industry analysis, materials science, organization, production management, research methods, philosophical process, research management |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Information Management, Construction Materials, Research Practice, Quality Management, Health and Safety, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here