Sassano, G (2022) Optimism bias and cost overruns: experimenting on the internal and external views in resources and time estimation. PhD thesis, University College London, UK.
Abstract
Optimism bias affects most estimation based human decisions, from daily activities to the appraisal of big infrastructure projects. Building upon the underlying constructs of this behaviour through the lenses of support and prospect theories, operationalised in the internal and external view in the project management context, helped me to formulate a conceptual framework. This framework, called the Holistic view suggests ways to integrate the two perspectives with the aim to improve the quality of forecasts in infrastructure management. Integration can be achieved by including subjective probabilities and unpacking techniques into case-based reasoning methods. Based on this framework and on the analysis of the relevant policies, perspectives, definitions and techniques provided by the literature on optimism bias in project forecasting, I designed and administered four experiments, with a sample of 231 participants. The results of the first experiment show that there is a positive relationship between different levels of dispositional optimism and resource overruns. In the second experiment, I found that adding an optimism uplift to an estimate structurally increases forecast precision, however, this might lead to the use of more resources than when optimism uplift is not applied. In the third experiment, I found that unpacking, whilst making estimations slightly more precise, does not influence the estimations as in the previous case, but only the estimator. The results of the fourth experiment, combining unpacking with optimism uplift, indicated that forecast precision starkly increased, supporting the adoption of an Holistic view. This research shows the relevance of experimental methods in project management, unveils new relationships between different perspectives in the project forecasting field, and analyses, net of other factors, the impact of forecasting tools integrated in some of the policies addressing the effect of optimism bias in estimations, suggesting ways to improve those and the overall forecasting process of infrastructure projects.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | bias; optimism bias; reasoning; forecasting; infrastructure management; integration; estimator; case-based reasoning; cost overrun; infrastructure project; experiment |
| Index terms: | project management, optimism bias, reasoning, uplift, estimation, overrun, prospect theory, infrastructure project, estimator, estimate, bias, appraisal, integration, conceptual framework, time estimation, case-based reasoning, cost overrun, forecasting, infrastructure management, experiment |
| Subjects: | factor and component analysis, prediction and forecasting, economic analysis, structural engineering, organizational analysis, financial and cost management, operations research, cognitive psychology, probability and distributions, infrastructure engineering, project controls, profession, data collection methods, theoretical framing, project management theory and practice, infrastructure and transport systems |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Organizational Design, Roles and Professions, Time Control, Business Strategy, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here