Tamimi, M F (2022) Reliability and sensitivity analysis of civil and marine structures using machine-learning-assisted simulation. PhD thesis, Oklahoma State University, USA.
Abstract
Civil and marine structures are subjected to various deterioration mechanisms due to aggressive environmental effects or mechanical loads. In order to maintain an acceptable performance level of these structures, previous research have focused on developing methodologies to quantify their reliability and provide optimized management plans that can reduce the life-cycle cost and failure risk. However, the successful implementation of these methodologies is contingent upon the ability to consider various uncertainties associated with structural performance. These include uncertainties associated with environmental and human-induced stressors, as well as those affecting material and geometrical characterization as well as performance prediction models. Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) with a sufficient number of samples can provide accurate quantification of the structural performance under uncertainty. However, for complex problems that require detailed finite element (FE) modeling to predict the system performance, the computational cost can be very high. This problem can be addressed by using advanced sampling techniques that can provide an accurate estimation of the reliability with a significantly lower number of samples. Another approach is to use surrogate models to establish an accurate approximation of the complex system behavior. These models can provide statistically equivalent results of a complex simulation model, with no known closed-form solution, through a limited number of original model executions. The proposed research focuses on developing probabilistic approaches for the performance assessment of civil and marine structures using machine-learning-assisted MCS. In this approach, machine learning is used to generate a surrogate model of the system response and is next integrated into the MCS to quantify the failure probability of the structure. Sensitivity analysis is conducted to identify the key contributing variables that significantly affect the system response. This process helps reduce the number of random variables associated with the problem resulting in a more efficient probabilistic simulation process. The developed approach was applied to solve two major research problems in civil and marine engineering: (a) reliability quantification of eccentrically loaded steel connections employing both welds and bolts for force transfer and (b) characterizing the crack propagation in stiffened panels and quantifying the reliability of ship hulls under realistic loading conditions.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Soliman, M |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | failure; reliability; uncertainty; deterioration; learning; life cycle; life cycle cost; probability; quantification; machine learning; Monte Carlo simulation; simulation |
| Index terms: | life cycle cost, crack propagation, sensitivity analysis, stressors, deterioration, machine learning, methodology, estimation, complex system, performance prediction, Monte Carlo simulation, life cycle, quantification, performance assessment, environmental effect, loading, modelling, implementation, sampling |
| Subjects: | artificial intelligence, financial and cost management, material degradation and durability, modelling and simulation, value management, data collection methods, systems engineering, health conditions and diseases, measurement and scaling, performance management, construction operations, contractual arrangements, analytical methods, environmental impact, environmental hazards, assessment methods, structural engineering, research methods |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Procurement, Sustainability, Quality Management, Cost Management, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Digital Applications, Human Resources, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here