Aboagye-Nimo, E; Raidén, A B and Tietze, S (2011) Investigating good health and safety practices in small construction firms in the United Kingdom. In: Egbu, C and Lou, E C W (eds.) Proceedings of 27th Annual ARCOM Conference, 5-7 September 2011, Bristol, UK.
Abstract
Increasing attention on Health and Safety has been imposed upon workers in small construction firms in recent years as there is a continuous strive for the safety of workers in the construction industry. Policy and procedures have been the main focus of many initiatives but the practices of construction workers on site have been reported to differ from the safety policies which are sometimes constructed only as a bureaucratic requirement. Research suggests that workers in the construction industry would rather apply a common sense approach to their health and safety practices which they believe leads to good health and safety practices and hence safety of the workers. A recent PhD research project set out to explore these good health and safety practices of workers of small construction firms in-depth and critically review their relationship to health and safety policy. This paper discusses the rationale and research methodology for the project: data will be collected via semi-structured interviews and non-participant observations to form case studies of different firms operating on site in the East Midlands region of the United Kingdom. The East Midlands is a particularly attractive location for a study of good practice as health and safety records show a steady decline in accidents and injuries in the past decade. The research is being conducted with a qualitative approach to gain rich data on site practices and workers perceptions. Thus, the research will offer in-depth information on local conditions under which good practices are carried out in ensuring the health and safety of small construction firm workers.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | health and safety; policy; qualitative research; small firms; site practice |
| Index terms: | good practice, small construction firm, United Kingdom, qualitative approach, injury, case study, health and safety, interview, observation, health and safety practices, construction worker, construction industry, research methodology, qualitative research |
| Subjects: | practitioner, organization, research design and methodology, data collection methods, health safety and environment, Geography, research methods, performance measurement, industry analysis, health conditions and diseases, occupational health and safety management |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here