Akplotsyi, R and Mahdjoubi, L (2011) Effects of learning styles on engaging children in school projects. In: Egbu, C and Lou, E C W (eds.) Proceedings of 27th Annual ARCOM Conference, 5-7 September 2011, Bristol, UK.
Abstract
The importance of children s engagement in school projects has been widely acknowledged. Despite various initiatives and efforts promote it, the effectiveness of children s engagement has remained limited. Available evidence suggests that most prevailing participation methods, employed in school design projects, continue to exclude groups of children due to the disparity between built environment professionals methods of engagement and children s preferred way of interacting with information. The research sought to determine whether engagement methods could be more effective targeted by determining and incorporating children s learning styles preferences. There are a number of different learning styles models, but the visual, auditory and kinaesthetic (VAK) is the most widely used. However, VAK is generic and is not fully suitable for children. As a result a child friendly-customised VAK learning style preferences questionnaire was developed to classify children s learning preferences into three sensory modalities in a range of activities across the primary curriculum. 151 Key Stage 1 and 2 pupils from four primary schools in the UK participated in the study. The results revealed that preferences for engagement methods differed significantly between the three learning style modalities. The findings confirmed that understanding children s learning style preferences is an important consideration when deciding engagement methods for school projects.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | children; learning styles; methods of engagement; school projects |
| Index terms: | learning style, pupil, children, disparity, preference, evidence, questionnaire, effectiveness, built environment |
| Subjects: | learning methods, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, decision-making and reasoning, performance management, infrastructure and transport systems, demography, social justice, sociology |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Ethics, Quality Management, Urban Studies, Education |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here