Hällström, A A F (2023) Collaborative project delivery models in infrastructure construction. PhD thesis, Chalmers Tekniska Hogskola, Sweden.
Abstract
When projects grow into megaprojects, their management becomes more complex due to an increasing number of inter-organisational interfaces within the project organisation. Spurred on by both the growing size of projects but also the adversity and confict-prone culture characteristic of construction, the infrastructure industry has turned to collaborative project delivery models based on relational governance. However, little is known of this new phenomenon and as literature thus far mainly focused on the procurement phase and governance, researchers have called for further insight into the delivery phase and how projects using collaborative delivery models work in practice. This thesis aims to investigate the application of CPDM in infrastructure delivery projects and analyse changes introduced thereby for project actors. The aim is examined through three research questions: (1) How do social network dynamics explain the implementation of CPDM in the delivery phase of infrastructure projects; (2) How does using a CPDM impact project delivery; and (3) How does using a CPDM infuence the interaction between the project network and its institutional environment?Collaborative project delivery models are said to support trust-building, quicker decisionmaking, information fow and project quality through the interaction of informal relationships and formal contractual frameworks, emphasizing the social dimension of the project organisation. With these aspects in mind, I follow the recent stream of applying social network analysis and network theories to better understand these inter-organisational relations. To create deeper insight into the changing industry, I also study the interaction of the project with its environment through an institutional lens. This thesis builds on a qualitative research design based on four main case studies. The empirical data consists of interviews, observations and document analysis. I have also mapped the social networks in three projects and approach them through a qualitative lens, focusing on the interaction between the project network and its institutional framing.For megaproject research, this thesis adds rich data regarding project delivery and social networks created in large-scale project organisations. The research also identifes mechanics enabling the creation of collaborative organisations, but also the challenges of too well-connected networks. With respect to institutional change and institutional logics, this thesis adds insight and empirical examples of how logics interact and develop within project organisations. The contrasting results from the case studies show how the project network can either enable or constrain the development of new institutions and logics and how the project acts as an arena for change. As for social network theory, this thesis adds insight into the development of networks and the importance of the ties between actors as conduits of fows within the network, both pertaining to resources and change. Through empirical examples of three project networks, this thesis explains how the ‘snapshots’ of project networks have come to be and how they might develop. Finally, for practitioners, this thesis highlights the need for a collaborative mindset from the get-go and the importance of the formal framework as an enabler of informal social ties. For those working in the feld of collaborative megaprojects, the fndings acknowledge the importance of the project network and social dynamics within the project. It also highlights the necessary changes in roles and behaviours, especially in early project phases, as actors need to align their understanding of the project in unaccustomed ways.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Bosch-Sijtsema, P |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | culture; trust; governance; infrastructure construction; project delivery; network analysis; social network analysis; case study; document analysis; qualitative research; infrastructure project; megaproject; project organisation; interview |
| Index terms: | collaborative project, infrastructure construction, governance, project organization, document analysis, implementation, institutional change, institutional logic, megaproject, social network theory, social network analysis, dynamics, infrastructure project, social network, infrastructure delivery, stream, framing, qualitative research, social ties, project network, interview, dimension, interaction, case study, practitioner, mindset, project delivery, network analysis, trust-building |
| Subjects: | data science, strategic project management, data analysis and analytics, project planning, systems engineering, research methods, psychology, data collection methods, infrastructure and transport systems, contractual arrangements, water management, organizational theory, sociology, practitioner, health monitoring assessment and metrics, civil engineering, business, project delivery, conceptual models, health behaviours and lifestyles, behavioral psychology, theoretical framing, research design and methodology |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Roles and Professions, Governance, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Procurement, Project Management, Health and Safety, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here