He, R (2023) Modeling of sustainable materials management systems: Hybrid science-based, data-driven approaches. PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, USA.
Abstract
Fueled by growing waste generation, worsening impacts of climate change, and tightening resource constraints, societies are beginning to pivot to a circular economy, of which sustainable materials management (SMM) is a crucial component. Under this SMM paradigm, solid waste management systems (SWMS) need to serve the dual purposes of waste disposal and resource valorization in technologically feasible, economically beneficial, environmentally responsible, and socially benign ways. This requires innovative holistic approaches for understanding the flows and stocks of resources, deploying appropriate treatment and valorization technologies, and mobilizing social and financial capital. To advance the scientific understanding of SMM and to tackle the dilemma of coupling between complex science and scarce data, this dissertation leverages system dynamics perspectives and data-driven quantification capabilities to develop novel science-based, data-driven models for supporting real-world SMM decisions.As a prerequisite of SMM, a hybrid demand forecast framework is built by integrating empirical evidence-informed future scenarios into a stocks dynamics model to project future stocks and flows of materials. This adaptable framework is applied to forecast the U.S. copper demand and stocks from 2016 to 2070, which reveals a stabilizing trend of per capita in-use stock and growing trends of consumption and end-of-life (EOL) copper generation. By analyzing various U.S.-specific future scenarios, the recovery of EOL materials is identified as a main sustainability challenge. To understand the mechanisms of EOL recovery and the potential of data-driven modeling, a comprehensive global knowledge base is built by reviewing and compiling data on municipal solid waste (MSW) generation, characterization, and management practices. A total of 1,720 records from various reputable sources, including NGO databases, governmental reports, and peer-reviewed articles are collected to build statistical models that predict MSW generation, composition, and management practices using 18 socioeconomic variables. This knowledge base not only systemizes sub-domains of SWMS knowledge into a comprehensive framework, but also highlights pervasive data and knowledge gaps. To address the need for decision support in the new era of SMM while facing the challenge of insufficient data, a novel hybrid machine learning model is built by imposing the holistic decision-making context of SWMS on a traditional neural network architecture. The hybrid model is capable of learning various technical, economic, and behavioral aspects of SWMS using the relatively small and heterogeneous dataset in the knowledge base. In comparison, the hybrid model not only outperforms traditional machine learning models with similar complexity in prediction errors and convergence rates, but also offers superior interpretability for policy decision support.In summary, this dissertation is intended to empower SMM decision makers with a suite of hybrid tools for forecasting material flows and stocks, revealing the data landscape of EOL streams, and modeling the entire decision-making context of SWMS. From the methodology innovation standpoint, this dissertation pioneers and contributes to the nascent research field of integrating sustainability science with data science.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Small, M J |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | complexity; decision support; sustainability; circular economy; climate change; forecasting; innovation; learning; materials management; policy; waste disposal; waste management; neural network; quantification; machine learning |
| Index terms: | waste disposal, sustainable material, consumption, dataset, machine learning, financial capital, climate change, materials management, complexity, stream, system dynamics, municipal solid waste, methodology, management practice, decision-making, waste management, resource constraint, evidence, neural network, science, knowledge base, sustainability challenge, management system, decision support, society, statistical model, dissertation, modelling, solid waste management, dynamics, copper, paradigm, holistic approach, waste generation, database, circular economy, coupling, recovery, quantification, forecasting |
| Subjects: | data management, measurement and scaling, decision analysis, environmental engineering, systems engineering, information systems, management, education and knowledge transfer, traditional and composite building materials, water management, artificial intelligence, data science, prediction and forecasting, business, computing systems, asset management, communities and social development, research methods, sustainable design, operations management, analytical methods, evaluation and assessment methods, research dissemination and communication, environmental issues, consumer economics, sustainable materials, waste management, environmental impact, specialized education, climate science |
| Topics: | Education, Sustainability, Risk Management, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Site Management, Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here