Efficient and accurate assessment of fire spread over external claddings in high-rise buildings

Li, C (2023) Efficient and accurate assessment of fire spread over external claddings in high-rise buildings. PhD thesis, University of Manchester, UK.

Abstract

The general aim of this thesis is to develop an efficient and accurate model to simulate upward flame spread in unventilated and ventilated cladding systems. The validated model is then used to assess the current Euroclass system of selecting external materials and proposes guidelines on how to improve external material selection while still within the simplistic framework of regulations. The model consists of the following main sub-models: a one-dimensional combined heat and mass transfer model to compute gaseous fuel production due to decomposition, and a simplified model to calculate surface heat flux and transient flame growth. To demonstrate the capability of the new model, vertical burning and upward flame spread on 2.4m high panels of wood and 5.0 m high panels of PMMA are carried out and compared with experimental results and FDS simulations. The new model calculation results, including propagation of the pyrolysis front, total heat flux, and heat release rate are in good agreement with experimental and FDS's results. However, the new model requires a fraction (a few minutes of CPU time) of that for carrying out the corresponding FDS simulation (CPU time of 2 days). The validated fire spread model was used to quantify the realistic ranges of combustible materials represented by the same SBI classification. The material properties were obtained by inverse analysis so that their combinations would exactly achieve the relevant thresholds for Class B and Class C materials according to SBI test. This thesis assessed fire spread behaviour of these materials in Full-scale test (BS 8414) when used as cladding, either on its own, or in combination with another material, both with and without cavity ventilation. The majority, but not all Class B materials would be able to pass the BS 8414 full-scale fire test criterion for flame height. The Class B materials that do not pass the acceptance criterion are combinations of high density (>120kg/m3) and high heat of combustion (>16 MJ/kg). Many Class C materials could still pass the BS 8414 full-scale fire test criterion for flame height. Such materials are characterized by low density (< 60kg/m³) and low heat of combustion (< 16 MJ/kg). The SBI-based material specification for multi-layered façade is severely restrictive if the insulation material is encapsulated by a non-combustible external surface. Instead of achieving Class A2, even Class C insulation materials can be used provided the thickness of the external layer is not lower than a critical thickness. This critical thickness is no more than a few mms and can be easily achieved in practice.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Craft, T and Wang, Y
Uncontrolled Keywords: façade; specification; regulation; simulation
Index terms: high-rise building, regulation, ventilation, specification, thickness, material property, insulation, cladding, propagation, wood, fire spread, density
Subjects: contractual condition, material properties and characteristics, traditional and composite building materials, political science, occupational health and safety management, engineering process, air quality, building materials, materials science, construction type, analytical methods
Topics: Engineering Principles, Health and Safety, Construction Materials, Construction Technology, Governance, Design Practice, Urban Studies, Contract Administration
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here