Rempelos, G (2023) A whole life carbon model for railway track system interventions. PhD thesis, University of Southampton, UK.
Abstract
The aim of this thesis is to develop an integrated methodology for investigating the potential for a range of novel interventions to reduce the whole-life carbon footprint and Life Cycle Costs (LCC) of ballasted track. Existing methods for assessing the socio-economic performance of railway infrastructure have often been found wanting. A review of the academic literature in the field has been undertaken and methodologies with the potential to improve the socio-economic modelling of railway infrastructure have been identified. A modelling framework for environmental and financial appraisal has been developed by combining principles of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Life Cycle Cost Assessment (LCCA) approaches. Its applicability has been tested through a range of exemplar case studies. The framework has been first tested at the component level, by examining the whole life carbon footprint and LCC of the four most common railway sleeper types present in the UK railway network. Then it has been expanded, by incorporating a detailed Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) inventory of different Switch and Crossing (S&C) design variants. This enabled the quantification (at the asset level) of the whole life carbon footprint and carbon costs of fifteen (six turnouts and nine crossovers) designs variants. The framework was then extended with the capability of examining the performance of novel modifications to the conventional ballasted track. A methodology based on relative settlement was proposed to adapt the results of laboratory element tests into a suitable input into an existing industry-based track geometry degradation model, allowing the estimation of the carbon footprint and Life Cycle Costs (LCC) at the route level. Finally, test results were applied to two practical case studies, demonstrating the capabilities of the model in evaluating and comparing the long-term performance from the inclusion of seven novel track interventions, so as to assess the case for altering current practice.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Preston, J and Blainey, S |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | carbon footprint; inventory; railway; railway track; life cycle; UK; quantification; case study; life cycle cost |
| Index terms: | modelling, case study, geometry, quantification, carbon footprint, inventory, estimation, life cycle, degradation, methodology, appraisal, railway track, laboratory, life cycle cost, life cycle assessment |
| Subjects: | measurement and scaling, infrastructure and transport systems, data collection methods, mathematical modelling, value management, material degradation and durability, financial and cost management, factor and component analysis, research methods, inventory management, research management, environmental impact, analytical methods |
| Topics: | Supply Chain Management, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Cost Management, Research Practice, Construction Materials |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here