Caven, V and Diop, M (2011) Women and equality in architecture: An Anglo-French comparative study. In: Egbu, C and Lou, E C W (eds.) Proceedings of 27th Annual ARCOM Conference, 5-7 September 2011, Bristol, UK.
Abstract
Architecture in the UK and France has very different sociological and cultural origins resulting in variances in how work is organised. Workplace roles of women also show marked distinctions in terms of equality. The aim of this paper is to examine the quest for equality in architecture for women in both countries reporting the findings of an Anglo-French comparative study in to architects careers. In particular initiatives aiming to encourage more women in to the profession are explored with regard to their effectiveness. Using an interpretive and comparative approach within the qualitative paradigm, semi-structured in-depth interviews were carried out with a total of 48 women architects in the East Midlands (in the UK) and the Charente-Maritime (in France). All were asked about their careers in architecture, what had attracted them to the profession and their experiences of working in a male-dominated environment. Findings indicate surprising differences in levels of equality for women in the two countries and marked differences in women s experiences of working as an architect. Women have come to the profession in France much later than their British counterparts but are present in greater numbers and, on average, earn more than their male colleagues. The paper identifies and discusses the differences in working practices and identifies other factors which may help to explain this anomaly.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | architecture; equality; France; UK; women |
| Index terms: | profession, variance, working practice, paradigm, interview, women, architect, effectiveness, France, career, comparative study |
| Subjects: | institututions, sociology, Geography, profession, research design and methodology, data collection methods, measurement and scaling, professional development, management, performance management, education and knowledge transfer |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Information Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Quality Management, Geographical Context |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here