Hanus, V P (2025) Predicting critical management-controlled factors to increase productivity within the construction industry. DEngr thesis, George Washington University, USA.
Abstract
The construction industry has a historical and systematic issue with declining productivity. Specifically, Construction Labor Productivity has been studied for many decades and its decline has been documented beginning as early as 1909. This decline contrasts with other industries’ productivity trends. This industry comparison is noted in this Praxis using the professional & business as well as the manufacturing industries. The Bureau of Labor Statistics shows that Construction’s Labor Productivity has decreased by 17% since 1987 and its Total Factor Productivity has decreased by 22% since 1987 even as other industries have shown increased Labor Productivity and Total Factor Productivity during the same period. The cost of declining productivity in construction levels a significant cost on the US, as construction represents 4.4% of the entire US Gross Domestic Product. It is hypothesized that critical management-controlled factors, including overtime, safety incidents, labor turnover, and capital productivity can be used to increase both labor and total factor productivity in the construction industry. The statistical analysis resulted in linear regression models using correlated factors with R-squared values of 75.65% and 95.89% for predicting increased Construction Labor Productivity and Total Factor Productivity, respectively.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Biemer, S |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction labor; manufacturing; safety; professional; gross domestic product; productivity; statistical analysis; total factor productivity; regression model |
| Index terms: | turnover, productivity, regression model, labour productivity, economic indicator, construction labour, construction industry, statistical analysis, manufacturing industry, total factor productivity, gross domestic product, praxis |
| Subjects: | data analysis and analytics, production economics, reflexivity, statistical analysis, business management, management, economic analysis, industry analysis, data science |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Business Strategy, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here