Transaction costs in construction project team communications: Language model and network science applications

Bayhan, H G (2025) Transaction costs in construction project team communications: Language model and network science applications. PhD thesis, Michigan State University, USA.

Abstract

Project teams with diversified interests and talents allocate their limited resources according to a shared form of a plan to constitute temporary alliances in Architectural, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) industry. These resources, or goods, service, and knowledge, are transferred across technologically separable interfaces and those activities for which firms provide less costly management can be organized within productive teams. The dynamic nature of acquiring and processing information, contractual and organizational relationships, technology adoption and uncertain environments affect the collaboration dynamics which lead to determining overall performance of the projects. However, despite the critical role of these ‘softer’ social dynamics, they have yet to be comprehensively examined through the lens of transaction cost (TC) theory in existing literature, especially amid profound technological and environmental shifts.This dissertation examines these dynamics and the potential of generative AI (GAI), specifically attention-based language models, within inter-organizational project networks to uncover tangible lessons learned for improving project collaboration. It outlines the steps from data acquisition to analysis, focusing on multi-level communication dynamics and performance-related documents from a complex healthcare project and a medium-complexity mixed-use project in Michigan, USA. The study integrates quantitative and qualitative datasets, including emails, semi-structured interviews, surveys, construction documents, and interorganizational meeting recordings. Social Network Analysis (SNA) guides the investigation of communication networks, while language models are assessed for classification and communication-related tasks. Programming languages Python and R facilitate data cleaning, statistical tests, and visualizations, with code snippets provided in the appendix for replication. After the introductory section, the second chapter (1) investigates how complex relationships from task descriptions can be categorized and tracked, comparing current machine learning methods and fine-tuned open-source language models with limited training data, considering real-world AEC industry mindset. (2) The third chapter explores how times of disruption (ToD) affect communication dynamics among interorganizational project networks through a COVID-19 case study. (3) The fourth chapter explores text complexity metrics, absorptive capacity (ACAP) measured through tier and role based characteristics, and GAI’s role in AEC communications, analyzing how project parties perceive its effectiveness in refining emails and RFIs to reduce TCs.Key findings highlight the value of GAI and strategic communication: (1) Fine-tuned language models can outperform current machine learning methods in categorizing complex tasks, especially when provided with detailed descriptions that reveal underlying social dynamics. (2) Balancing direct and indirect communication can enhance information flow between central project members and distant parties, particularly subcontractors with high specificity, during ToD. TC Theory highlights the need for adaptive, tier-specific management, and flexibility, especially from Tier 1 leaders, to sustain network stability and project continuity. (3) GAI’s editing capabilities can effectively tailor text complexity and readability to facilitate project communication, provided appropriability safeguards private information. (4) Overall, a cohesive strategy of strategic communication, adaptability, and generative technologies can optimize project outcomes by reducing knowledge transfer frictions and harnessing stakeholders’ authentic strengths.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Mollaoglu, S
Uncontrolled Keywords: absorptive capacity; complexity; flexibility; healthcare; architectural engineering; cleaning; collaboration; learning; programming; training; network analysis; social network analysis; case study; machine learning; project team; transaction cost; communication; visualization; stakeholder; subcontractor; interview
Index terms: project outcome, case study, interorganizational, construction project team, mixed-use project, network analysis, safeguards, cleaning, technology adoption, data acquisition, project team, dissertation, editing, inter-organizational project, effectiveness, investigation, dynamics, architectural engineering, survey, information flow, project party, science, social network analysis, stability, mindset, strategy, absorptive capacity, project communication, communication network, project network, transaction cost, COVID-19, interview, complexity, statistical test, subcontractor, machine learning, visualization, lessons learned, dataset, adaptability, documents, knowledge transfer, programming, collaboration
Subjects: project planning, innovation and technology management, user focus, project completion, construction type, research dissemination and communication, practitioner, health behaviours and lifestyles, programming, specialized education, networking, financial analysis, maintenance engineering, research methods, structural engineering, theoretical framing, organizational theory, project delivery, data analysis and analytics, artificial intelligence, business, data collection methods, sociology, occupational health and safety management, data management, statistical analysis, systems engineering, information systems, performance management, design practice, health risk and incident analysis, management, professional development
Topics: Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Construction Technology, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Information Management, Research Practice, Education, Quality Management, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Project Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here