Hlatshwayo, T N s (2024) Enabling legislative coherence in the Eswatini construction industry. PhD thesis, Nelson Mandela University, South Africa.
Abstract
The construction industry is an age-old and highly dynamic sector that contributes to the betterment of human life through the development of infrastructure. The presence of regulations is crucial in ensuring the provision of quality, standardization, efficiency, and effectiveness in service delivery. Inadequate regulation of the construction industry has been identified as the primary cause of construction failures in both developing and developed nations. Eswatini is no exception to this issue of legislative failure. The Construction Industry Council (CIC) was established by the Government of Eswatini without initially determining the specific challenges faced by the construction industry in Eswatini. The unique legislative needs pertaining to Eswatini were not explored to ensure that the framework is tailor-made for the Eswatini sector. Given the industry's diverse and intricate nature, a generic approach would not be sufficient to create a unified legislative framework. The study was aimed at developing a coherent legislative framework for the Eswatini construction industry. This study used a mixed-methods research design, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative data. A total of 297 participants were randomly selected from the CIC database for the quantitative survey. A total of 45 interviewees were purposively selected for the semi-structured interviews. Descriptive and inferential analysis were used for the interpretation of the quantitative data. Thematic analysis was used for the qualitative data. Exploratory Factor Analysis, using the maximum likelihood method with Varimax Rotation was employed to analyse the factor structure and correlation between items of the quantitative data. Additionally, the KMO and Bartlett's Tests were conducted. The ANOVA Test was used to test the hypothesis. Thematic analysis was employed for the qualitative data analysis. The findings of this study revealed that contractors in Eswatini recognised the significance of a well-functioning legislative framework and expressed dissatisfaction with the existing legislative measures implemented in the country. The key informant interviews highlighted various challenges, including the absence of regulations for the implementation of the CIC Act, lack of accountability and transparency in the management of funds for CIC operations and inadequate grading criteria. Other challenges that were revealed were insufficient oversight, unfair competition, corruption and limited stakeholder engagement.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | accountability; competition; corruption; government; service delivery; standardization; stakeholder; factor analysis; thematic analysis; failure; regulation; interview |
| Index terms: | exploratory factor analysis, interview, data analysis, accountability, survey, competition, corruption, thematic analysis, regulation, coherence, efficiency, service delivery, research design, database, standardization, factor analysis, effectiveness, stakeholder engagement, presence, implementation, construction industry, transparency |
| Subjects: | contractual arrangements, environmental science, human factors and perception, market analysis, professional ethics, liability law, data analysis and analytics, data collection methods, research design and methodology, community and social dimensions, data management, industry analysis, statistical analysis, political science, performance measurement, performance management, service delivery, methods and analysis, professional development |
| Topics: | Information Management, Research Practice, Governance, Stakeholder Management, Digital Applications, Project Management, Sustainability, Procurement, Quality Management, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here