Cognitive abstractions for visual communication

Mukherjee, K (2025) Cognitive abstractions for visual communication. PhD thesis, University of Wisconsin - Madison, USA.

Abstract

Visual communication is a fundamental cornerstone of many human endeavors. The most ornate and staggering of buildings begin as strokes on paper shared between architects, Nobel prize winning scientific advances begin as graphs shared among lab members, and the most ineffable of emotions can be communicated with a single patch of color. These examples speak to the ability of the human mind to abstract relevant features from the naturalistic world in service of pithily creating new visual artifacts that convey complex ideas while raising the central question animating this dissertation - How does the mind abstract from prior experiences to produce and understand visual artifacts – sketches, charts, maps, and diagrams? Through a series of experiments organized around two domains — color semantics and drawing — the reported studies investigate the nature of the mental representations that support such visual abstraction. Evidence shows that these representations are best characterized by cross-modal models that capture the rich patterns of covariation not only in the visual world but between vision and natural language. We also show that the manner in which humans deploy these representations for effective visual communication are context sensitive, requiring computational cognitive models to ‘decode’ behavior from these representations. Chapter 1 presents a characterization of the conceptual space that underlies people’s color-concept associations and shows that it is distinct from both connotative and language-based conceptual spaces. Chapter 2 presents a theory of how people deploy their color concept associations using models of assignment inference to interpret the meanings of colors in visualizations and what the limits on the ability to do so are. Chapter 3 investigates how deep neural network models of vision can be leveraged in addition to cognitively circumscribed theories to explain how people represent similarities between abstract drawings of real-world objects. Lastly, chapter 4 describes how large-scale drawing production and recognition studies can both help unpack the contents of human visual semantic knowledge and also critically evaluate AI systems in their ability to perform visual abstraction.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Rogers, T T and Schloss, K B
Uncontrolled Keywords: communication; neural network; visualization; architect; experiment
Index terms: evidence, visualization, maps, neural network, artifact, meaning, drawing, experiment, architect, dissertation, semantics
Subjects: design practice, sociology, data collection methods, profession, artificial intelligence, technical documentation, spatial and geospatial analysis, evaluation and assessment methods, research dissemination and communication, analytical methods
Topics: Digital Applications, Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here