A building centric urban digital twin for resiliency planning

Raja, P (2025) A building centric urban digital twin for resiliency planning. PhD thesis, Rutgers The State University of New Jersey, USA.

Abstract

Digital twin technology, as an emerging modeling and simulation paradigm, holds significant potential for advancing flood risk management. However, the development of digital twins for flood mitigation relies on accurate and reliable building asset data as a foundational layer. Acquiring such data for numerous buildings remains challenging due to uncertainties in existing sources and methods.This study focuses on the built environment data layer of the digital twin, emphasizing the identification of spatial structural indicators critical for flood mitigation. It evaluates potential data sources and technologies, assessing their quality in terms of uncertainty, bias, and equity. The research begins by identifying key spatial structural indicators and corresponding capture methods, forming the basis for a framework to address data gaps, reduce uncertainties, and enhance completeness. This framework supports the creation of a robust urban digital twin to improve flood resilience at a city-wide scale.The study introduces Levels of Detail (LoDs) as a method for abstracting complex building information into essential attributes, simplifying data management and analysis within the digital twin framework. It categorizes spatial indicators essential for flood risk assessment at varying levels of complexity and employs Bayesian linear regression to evaluate the impact of LoDs on flood mitigation decisions. A case study on Hurricane Ida in Manville, New Jersey, demonstrates the feasibility of this approach, showing improved prediction accuracy with higher LoDs.To address the challenge of acquiring critical yet costly data, such as first-floor elevation (FFE), the study leverages inferencing and imputation techniques. Inferencing is applied by classifying buildings based on architectural typologies and utilizing data libraries to estimate missing FFE values. Additionally, geostatistical imputation is employed to predict the FFE of buildings where data collection is unavailable. These techniques significantly enhance the representation of urban structures in the digital twin, mitigating data acquisition challenges while ensuring accuracy across diverse urban and coastal environments.In summary, this research presents a systematic approach to developing a building-centric urban digital twin for flood resilience planning. By integrating spatial indicators, LoD abstraction, inferencing and imputation strategies, it enables accurate representation of urban structures, supports informed decision-making, and facilitates proactive measures to enhance resilience against flooding.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Gong, J
Uncontrolled Keywords: accuracy; bias; built environment; complexity; uncertainty; data management; decision making; risk assessment; risk management; Jersey; case study; simulation; digital twin
Index terms: case study, data management, built environment, risk management, paradigm, risk assessment, data acquisition, estimate, modelling, New Jersey, accuracy, flood risk management, flooding, strategy, bias, decision-making, flood mitigation, complexity, Jersey, digital twin
Subjects: digital engineering, analytical methods, Geography, financial risk, environmental hazards, data collection methods, risk assessment, financial and cost management, management, education and knowledge transfer, probability and distributions, professional development, data management, decision analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, systems engineering
Topics: Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Risk Management, Sustainability, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Information Management, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here