Xu, X (2024) A multi-agent reinforcement learning task allocation framework for navigation sequences of construction robots. PhD thesis, New York University Tandon School of Engineering, USA.
Abstract
Construction robotics, while steadily gaining research traction, encounter practical constraints limiting widespread adoption, with challenges stemming from the dynamic nature of construction environments and the inefficiencies inherent in single-agent robotic applications. Traditional programming methods prove insufficient for tasks subject to frequent changes, necessitating a new approach to task allocation and coordination for construction robots. Addressing these, our research introduces a transformative framework integrating Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) with construction robotics, advancing task allocation autonomy without prescriptive datasets or manual programming. Still, there are some big technical challenges. Most importantly, we need an environment to be modeled, benchmarked, and tested with various options. In order to build these training schemes. This thesis proposed a modular framework to implement multi-robot training: It allows robotic platforms, working environments, hardcoded construction activities, task logic, and training algorithms to be substituted to find the optimal solution in various construction scenarios. This research utilizes small-scale mobile robots to navigate various workspaces and perform diverse tasks, serving as a case study to validate the proposed framework. It specifically considers the mobile nature of construction robots as opposed to the static robots typically found in manufacturing, thereby addressing the dynamics, allowing for role adaptability, and enhancing the realism of simulations. Given the complexity and variability of the tasks, a 2D ROS-based simulation environment was developed, which has shown promising results in task scheduling and robot positioning among multiple construction robots. This framework paves the way for integrating robots with training algorithms across various construction settings, thereby boosting productivity and fostering wider acceptance of construction robotics.Despite its potential, the current framework has limitations. It is unclear which algorithms are most effective for training task allocation strategies on dynamic construction sites. However, the framework acts as a valuable testbed for further development and benchmarking of suitable algorithms. The model simplifies work logic and physical elements, leaving scope for addressing more complex scenarios, such as role changes and collaboration on construction sites. Moving forward, I plan to enhance the training environment to accommodate a broader range of scenarios. Users could adapt the navigation actions to other construction activities, such as manipulation and data collection, to get the optimal sequential orders. Future efforts will also focus on leveraging advanced simulators like ISAAC Nvidia for faster training and improved robot performance.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Garcia de Soto, B |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | complexity; construction activities; coordination; benchmarking; collaboration; learning; manufacturing; programming; scheduling; training; productivity; case study; construction site; robotic; simulation |
| Index terms: | benchmarking, task scheduling, complexity, strategy, variability, construction activity, platform, realism, reinforcement, construction site, case study, programming, productivity, workspace, dynamics, agent, option, collaboration, dataset, advanced construction robotics, adaptability, traction, coordination, scheduling |
| Subjects: | statistical analysis, programming, building construction, education and knowledge transfer, building materials, data collection methods, data management, practitioner, user focus, digital design, performance measurement, operations research, systems engineering, transportation engineering, decision analysis, work location, construction operations, management |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Digital Applications, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Design Practice, Engineering Principles, Quality Management, Site Management, Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Time Control, Construction Materials |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here